Azure NetApp Files vs Wasabi comparison

NetApp and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.3, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. NetApp holds a 7.2% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,387 Views
1,508 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 9 Wasabi reviews

2,613 Views
1,664 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Azure NetApp Files and Wasabi are two prominent storage solutions. Wasabi receives more positive user reviews for its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, although Azure NetApp Files is preferred for complex enterprise environments due to its integration features.

Features: Azure NetApp Files is known for its seamless integration with Microsoft services, advanced data management capabilities, and robust security features. Wasabi stands out for its simplicity, unlimited free egress, and scalable storage options.

Room for Improvement: Azure NetApp Files users suggest a need for better cost transparency, more intuitive management options, and improved setup processes. Wasabi could enhance its limited integration with certain enterprise systems, add advanced features found in competitors, and improve its user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files offers robust deployment options and comprehensive customer service, suitable for large enterprises with complex needs. Wasabi is praised for its simple and quick deployment model but has mixed reviews regarding customer support, with some users finding it less responsive compared to Azure NetApp Files.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files users often highlight the high setup costs and complexity in achieving ROI. Wasabi is favored for its transparent, economical pricing and quicker ROI realization.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Storage (7th)

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 7.2%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 6.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

DavidWork

Owner at Earthclick.net

Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability

We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the SnapMirror feature in Azure NetApp Files. It helps me create backups with snapshots and makes data recovery and compression."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"Azure NetApp Files has been stable."

"The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility."

"It's elastic, so it scales with our demands. We can start small, then with the addition of customer loads, we can expand on-the-fly without the need to reprovision something."

"Since we have NetApp's internally, we use the SnapMirror predominantly for this process in the cloud which is beneficial."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations."

"We were looking for a clustered solution that has over-complicated things because we had it in AWS, which is Amazon. There was a solution for clustered NetApp. That meant there would be two NetApps that were not clustered because there was no solution for a cluster. We would like there to be an HA cluster solution."

"Its pricing can be better."

"The deployment process is somewhat complex compared to other storage solutions."

"I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option."

"We would like for the files which are coming in that we can version them. So, if a file is accidentally deleted, there should have a recycle bin option where we can go back, and at least once, clean it up."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"The scalability could be improved."

"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

"The scalability could improve."

"Wasabi could be cheaper."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage."

"Its price is double the price of the premium disks, which is the main reason why customers don't go for this solution in the end."

"We are currently on a pay-as-you-go model with the storage that we use."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"The price is reasonable."

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

The solution's competitors like Oracle or Amazon are not cheap either. I think we're paying two million dollars for Azure NetApp Files. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is exp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Wasabi?

The tool is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?

We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 37% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 29% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 46% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 26% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

April 2025

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2025

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files is designed for unstructured data, virtualized SAP systems, SQL backups, NFS and CIFS protocols, Azure Virtual Desktop storage, and optimizing file share services. It supports high performance and networking integration in Microsoft Azure.

Azure NetApp Files offers features such as SnapMirror for data protection, rapid provisioning, elastic scaling, and ultra-fast SQL backup and restore. It provides a seamless experience with fast snapshotting, high availability, security, and ease of setup. Users benefit from significant performance improvements and the ability to manage substantial workload migrations effortlessly. This service is ideal for environments like Azure Kubernetes Service and cloud EPM platforms, where speed, flexibility, and performance are crucial.

What are the key features?

Flexibility: Adaptable to diverse storage needs.
Rapid response time: Ensures quick data access and operations.
SnapMirror: Provides replication and data protection.
SEC compliance: SnapLock ensures regulatory adherence.
Ultra-fast SQL backup: Quicker backup and restore operations.
Elastic scaling: Easily adjusts resources based on demand.
Fast snapshotting: Enables quick data snapshots.
High availability: Ensures consistent data access.
Security: Robust measures for data protection.

What are the expected benefits and ROI?

Performance: Notable improvement in processing speeds.
Simplicity of setup: Easy deployment and configuration.
Scalable management: Handles significant workload migrations with ease.
Cost efficiency: Allows comparing throughput versus cost effectively.

Azure NetApp Files is implemented in various industries requiring robust file storage solutions, from educational environments where performance boosts are critical to businesses leveraging Azure Kubernetes Service for containerized applications. It supports high-demand environments, optimizing data management and improving efficiency.

NetApp

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.