NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Wasabi comparison

NetApp and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. NetApp holds a 6.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,577 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 9 Wasabi reviews

2,613 Views
1,664 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Wasabi are both cloud storage solutions with distinct features and capabilities. Based on user reviews, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP appears to have better data management features, while Wasabi is noted for its competitive pricing.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers advanced data management, integration options, and scalability, making it highly valuable for complex use cases. Wasabi provides straightforward and affordable storage without added complexities. Users prefer NetApp for intricate needs and Wasabi for cost-effective storage solutions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest enhancements in cost predictability and simplifying certain configurations, and better integration with other cloud services. Wasabi users recommend improving integration with other cloud services, enhancing data transfer speeds, and adding more security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for smooth implementation and robust customer support, though some find the initial setup complex. Wasabi is commended for its simple setup process and responsive customer service, making deployment easier.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users report high initial setup costs but note good ROI due to extensive features. Wasabi users like the low setup costs and quick ROI due to its straightforward pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Storage (1st), Cloud Backup (9th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 6.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at Evolent Health

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

DavidWork

Owner at Earthclick.net

Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability

We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage."

"We use the mirroring to mirror our volumes to our DR location. We also create snapshots for backups. Snapshots will create a specified snapshot to be able to do a DR test without disrupting our standard mirrors. That means we can create a point-in-time snapshot, then use the ability of FlexClones to make a writeable volume to test with, and then blow it away after the DR test."

"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."

"NetApp's Integration with AWS has helped us because we had a tough time transferring data when we used an ONTAP competitor as our storage partner. They don't have integration with AWS tools, so we had to figure it out on our own. ONTAP has built-in integration and allows us to replicate a copy to our second data center."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc."

"This solution has made everything easier to do."

"The feature which I like the most is that it has the capabilities that the traditional storage system offers. It provides all the functionality. The deduplication and compression work exactly like ONTAP's traditional storage. So people who have experience with that find it very easy to manage."

"Its functionality and technical support are adequate to help prevent failure due to errors."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service."

"I would like to have more management tools. They are difficult to work with, so I would like them to be a bit more user-friendly."

"The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep."

"I would like this solution to be brought to all the three major players. Right now it's supported only on AWS and Azure. They should bring it to Google as well, because we would like to have flexibility in choosing the underlying cloud storage provider."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

"I would like to see more aggressive management of the aggregate space. On the Cloud Volumes ONTAP that we use for offsite backup copies, most of the data sits in S3. There are also the EBS volumes on the Cloud Volumes ONTAP itself. Sometimes what happens is that the aggregate size just stays the same. If it allocates 8 terabytes initially, it just stays at 8 terabytes for a long time, even though we're only using 20 percent of that 8 terabytes. NetApp could undersize that more aggressively."

"It would be fantastic if NetApp could offer a solution that's as user-friendly as Google Drive for seamless cloud storage integration."

"When Azure does their maintenance, they do maintenance on one node at a time. With the two nodes of the CVO, it can automatically fail over from one node to the node that is staying up. And when the first node comes back online, it will fail back to the first node. We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"Wasabi could be cheaper."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

"The scalability could be improved."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

"Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"The scalability could improve."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."

"For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA."

"They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage..."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"We find the pricing to be favorable due to the educational sector we belong to."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"The price is reasonable."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

55%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

What do you like most about Wasabi?

The tool is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?

We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Zerto vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 2% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 47% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 26% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Zadara vs Wasabi

Compared 5% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2025

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

No data available

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

March 2025

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.