NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Wasabi comparison

NetApp and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. NetApp holds a 6.7% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,796 Views
1,587 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 9 Wasabi reviews

2,788 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Wasabi are both cloud storage solutions with distinct features and capabilities. Based on user reviews, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP appears to have better data management features, while Wasabi is noted for its competitive pricing.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers advanced data management, integration options, and scalability, making it highly valuable for complex use cases. Wasabi provides straightforward and affordable storage without added complexities. Users prefer NetApp for intricate needs and Wasabi for cost-effective storage solutions.

Room for Improvement: NetApp users suggest enhancements in cost predictability and simplifying certain configurations, and better integration with other cloud services. Wasabi users recommend improving integration with other cloud services, enhancing data transfer speeds, and adding more security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for smooth implementation and robust customer support, though some find the initial setup complex. Wasabi is commended for its simple setup process and responsive customer service, making deployment easier.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users report high initial setup costs but note good ROI due to extensive features. Wasabi users like the low setup costs and quick ROI due to its straightforward pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Storage (1st), Cloud Backup (10th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.7%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 7.0%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at Evolent Health

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

DavidWork

Owner at Earthclick.net

Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability

We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have very good support team who is very helpful. They will help you with every aspect of getting the deployment done."

"So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage."

"The initial setup was straightforward. We started with a small pilot and we then moved to production with no downtime at all."

"The fast recovery time objective with the ability to bring the environment back to production in case something happens."

"Multiprotocol is the most valuable because Amazon was not able to provide us with access to the same data from Linux and from Windows clients. That was our value proposition for CVO, Cloud Volumes ONTAP."

"The most valuable features of this solution are SnapShot, FlexClone, and deduplication."

"Another feature which gets a lot of attention in our environment is the File Services Solutions in the cloud, because it's a completely, fully-managed service. We don't have to take care of any updates, upgrades, or configurations."

"The main benefit we get from this product is the ability to deploy it anywhere we want, whether that's on-prem, a remote physical location, or in the cloud. It doesn't matter from an operational perspective where it is. The command line and operating system are the same."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"The solution could be better when we're connecting to our S3 side of the house. Right now, it doesn't see it, and I'm not sure why."

"Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration."

"Something we would like to see is the ability to better manage the setup and tie it to our configuration management database. We manage our whole IT infrastructure out of that database."

"The dashboard is a little bit clunky. I like to see it a little bit more on the simplistic side. I would like to be able to create my own widgets and customize what I want to see a little bit more versus what is currently there. That would be helpful so that when I log in, I go straight to my widget or my board without going to multiple places to get to what I need to find or build."

"I would like this solution to be brought to all the three major players. Right now it's supported only on AWS and Azure. They should bring it to Google as well, because we would like to have flexibility in choosing the underlying cloud storage provider."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

"When Azure does their maintenance, they do maintenance on one node at a time. With the two nodes of the CVO, it can automatically fail over from one node to the node that is staying up. And when the first node comes back online, it will fail back to the first node. We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly."

"I would like some more performance matrices to know what it is doing. It has some matrices inherent to the Cloud Volumes ONTAP. But inside Cloud Manager, it would also be nice to see. You can have a little Snapshot, then drill down if you go a little deeper."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"Wasabi could be cheaper."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

"The scalability could be improved."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

"Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement."

"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."

"Some flexibility around the licensing model would help. The product is licensed based on capacity. Basically, the largest capacity license that you can buy is 368 terabytes. At this point, NetApp is addressing some people's concerns around this."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."

"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

"The price is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

56%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

What do you like most about Wasabi?

The tool is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?

We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 10% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 48% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 24% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Wasabi

Compared 3% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

February 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

February 2025

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

No data available

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

January 2025

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.