Bacula Enterprise vs Quantum DXi Series comparison

Bacula Systems and Quantum are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #25 with an average rating of 10.0, while Quantum is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.5. Bacula Systems holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quantum’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Quantum users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

1,044 Views
904 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quantum DXi Series

Read 2 Quantum DXi Series reviews

293 Views
242 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

Quantum DXi Series

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Quantum DXi Series and Bacula Enterprise are prominent solutions in the data backup and recovery market. Bacula Enterprise appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, although Quantum DXi offers competitive pricing and support.

Features: Quantum DXi Series offers efficient data deduplication, replication capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Bacula Enterprise provides wide platform support, scalability, and extensive features for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Quantum DXi Series could enhance its reporting tools, offer a more intuitive management approach, and improve customer service responses. Bacula Enterprise needs a more user-friendly setup process, better documentation, and streamlined installation procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quantum DXi Series offers a straightforward deployment process but has mixed reviews on customer service. Bacula Enterprise has a complex deployment but receives positive feedback for its customer service efforts.

Pricing and ROI: Quantum DXi Series is noted for its cost-effectiveness and quick ROI. Bacula Enterprise, although costlier, is considered a worthwhile investment due to its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

25th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (18th)

Quantum DXi Series

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

32nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quantum DXi Series is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

PascalSebat

Business Unit Manager Data Protection at Cncr Group

A scalable solution with Veeam and Vertias alliance

I am impressed with the tool's technical alliance with Veeam and Veritas. The product needs to improve performance while scaling out. It also needs to improve stability. I have been using the product since seven years. I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. I would rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"While the challenges posed by the difficulties were significant, they prompted the replacement of problematic components, resulting in the resolution of issues. Importantly, there were no substantial ongoing concerns. Regarding the overall performance, it has been consistently excellent."

"I am impressed with the tool's technical alliance with Veeam and Veritas."

Cons

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"Perhaps the most notable area for enhancement lies in the web interface for management. The current limitations in LDAP editing capabilities are not addressed in the UI, and I haven't observed any recent updates. It's possible that the new version of the DXI service incorporates improvements in the GUI, but I cannot confirm. While there is room for improvement in the current GUI, it remains a relatively minor issue. Overall, the system is comprehensive, covering aspects such as reports on latency and networking, leaving little room for additional enhancements in those areas."

"The product needs to improve performance while scaling out. It also needs to improve stability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"I do not oversee this aspect, as pricing is contingent on factors such as volume, technical specifications, and the desired features. Consequently, I lack information on the pricing details and structure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quantum DXi Series?

While the challenges posed by the difficulties were significant, they prompted the replacement of problematic components, resulting in the resolution of issues. Importantly, there were no substanti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quantum DXi Series?

Perhaps the most notable area for enhancement lies in the web interface for management. The current limitations in LDAP editing capabilities are not addressed in the UI, and I haven't observed any ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quantum DXi Series?

I do not oversee this aspect, as pricing is contingent on factors such as volume, technical specifications, and the desired features. Consequently, I lack information on the pricing details and str...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 52% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 18% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 33% of the time

ExaGrid EX Series vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 28% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 10% of the time

DD Boost vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quantum DXi Series

Compared 7% of the time

More Quantum DXi Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download Quantum DXi Series product report

Also Known As

No data available

DXi Series, Quantum DX

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Quantum's DXi series deduplication solutions provides patented variable-length deduplication that not only reduces disk usage and capital expenditures, but also enables efficient data movement across the WAN to other sites and to the cloud.

Quantum

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

Nihon Unisys, Nikoyo China

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series

April 2025

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Quantum DXi Series report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.