If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
Code42 Incydr is valued for its real-time recovery, reporting, cloud integration, and ease of deployment. In comparison, Bacula Enterprise excels with file-level restore, platform support, and security but is more complex to configure. Buyers may prefer Code42 Incydr for simplicity or Bacula Enterprise for comprehensive capabilities.
They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest.
It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up.
They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest.
It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
