Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Betty Blocks vs CucumberStudio comparison

Betty Blocks and SmartBear are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Betty Blocks is ranked #32, while SmartBear is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.3. Betty Blocks holds a 0.2% mindshare in RADS, compared to SmartBear’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Betty Blocks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.
Betty Blocks
Read 2 Betty Blocks reviews
  • 329 Views
  • 149 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
CucumberStudio
Read 11 CucumberStudio reviews
  • 77 Views
  • 47 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CucumberStudio and Betty Blocks compete in simplifying development processes. Betty Blocks seems to have the upper hand with its robust features justifying higher pricing.

Features: CucumberStudio includes behavior-driven development tools, enabling collaboration between technical and non-technical teams. It also has integrated cloud capabilities for efficient project management and real-time updates for team synchronicity. Betty Blocks offers a no-code development platform, allowing the creation of complex applications without technical skills, rapid prototyping, and deployment for versatile application development, as well as an intuitive drag-and-drop interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CucumberStudio provides straightforward deployment with effective cloud integration and responsive support for quick project setups. Betty Blocks offers a comprehensive deployment model with dedicated onboarding and personalized customer service, suitable for large-scale implementations needing ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: CucumberStudio has lower initial setup costs, offering a quick return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Betty Blocks requires a higher upfront investment but its broad capabilities and long-term adaptability can yield substantial ROI for businesses developing multiple custom applications.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Betty Blocks
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
32nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No-Code Development Platforms (19th)
CucumberStudio
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
28th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Betty Blocks is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Hans De Groot - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive
Betty Blocks, when I started with it, was similar to a back-end platform with the ability to have a standardized back-office UI out of the box, which is perfect for a lot of situations. For more customer-facing UIs, we had to create the front end ourselves, building endpoints with HTML and JavaScript. Then Betty Blocks started in 2018 with the page builder. This allowed us to create drag-and-drop interfaces. That was quite cumbersome. Now Betty Blocks is entering a new generation of it - next generation forms - which should be a lot better. The most valuable feature is the back end. The way we can create action flows for things such as sending emails, creating PDF reports, or connecting to web services is very complete. I never experience a lack of functionality in it. The standardized back-office UI is said to be deprecated over time, which is a shame, because it is a real time-saver and is one of their strong points, only if it was kept up-to-date.
Read full review
Walter Wirch - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components
CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the back end."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."
"The solution is stable."
 

Cons

"I would like to see full integration with AI."
"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."
"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."
"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite high, but the pricing is also not very transparent."
"The pricing structure that we have been working with was based on a number of blocks."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
33%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Hiptest?
The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hiptest?
A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher. Introducing modern technology could improve the platform. API-based solutions are present but could benefit fr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Hiptest?
CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Betty Blocks Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Betty Blocks
Compared 100% of the time
More Betty Blocks Competitors
TestRail vs CucumberStudio Logo
TestRail vs CucumberStudio
Compared 100% of the time
More CucumberStudio Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Rapid Application Development Software
March 2025
Betty Blocks reportDownload Betty Blocks product report
Buyer's Guide
Rapid Application Development Software
March 2025
CucumberStudio reportDownload CucumberStudio product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Hiptest
 

Overview

From mobile apps to (customer) portals to back office management and everything in between. The Betty Blocks platform’s ease of use supports every size or complexity of your app. Go as far as you like, the easiest way possible.

Betty Blocks

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear
 

Sample Customers

KPMG, TELE2, Sligro Food Group, Ymere, Flexpoint Group
Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo
Buyer's Guide
Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio
March 2025
Free Report: Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio
Find out what your peers are saying about Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Betty Blocks vs. CucumberStudio report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.