CucumberStudio vs TestRail comparison

"The solution is stable."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"This is a user friendly solution."

"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."

"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"I use the solution for test management."

"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that there are various test case templates and test artifact maintenance."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."

"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"Customer support could be enhanced. All the support is provided via chat and emails. Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy."

"The reports should be more user-friendly."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."