CucumberStudio vs TestRail comparison

The compared SmartBear and IDERA solutions aren't in the same category. SmartBear is ranked #23 in RADS , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 0.6% mindshare in the category. IDERA is ranked #2 in TMT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

CucumberStudio

Read 12 CucumberStudio reviews

717 Views
394 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 24 TestRail reviews

1,640 Views
1,394 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,180 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (23rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (11th)

TestRail

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. CucumberStudio is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
TestRail, on the other hand, focuses on Test Management Tools, holds 7.7% mindshare, down 12.5% since last year.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CucumberStudio	0.6%
Microsoft Power Apps	9.5%
ServiceNow	6.5%
Other	83.4%

Rapid Application Development Software

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TestRail	7.7%
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.2%
Tricentis qTest	8.1%
Other	76.0%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

ChristineAnderssen

Release and Test Manager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Provides quick test management for agile workflows but lacks customization for reporting and dashboards

The analytics and reporting capabilities in TestRail are not very extensive and tailorable. This doesn't make it very suitable for enterprise level programs. With OpenText, you have a lot of flexibility. I'm talking about the old version of ALM, the desktop client, which I used when it was still Micro Focus ALM. It has a tremendous ability to generate different types of reports. You can build different graphs, have Word document format, Excel format, or write your own Excel queries and incorporate that into your own reporting. TestRail has one type of format. If you want to generate a test summary report, there is basically only one format that you can use. You can't add your own components. You can choose which portions of your test results you want to include by selecting certain sections, but you don't have freedom to add and remove sections yourself. It's predefined and all that you can do is just take out the ones that you don't want. It is usable, but it's not tailorable, it's not configurable, it just gives you the bare minimum. It depends on what you use the tool for. If you want to use TestRail for enterprise-level waterfall projects with traditional reporting and a lot of analytics, it's not good enough because the analytics, dashboards, and reporting are not really there. However, if you use it for agile and you want quick and easy with very simple functionality, then it's very good because it's simple to use. For agile use cases, it's great and you don't need more than that. But if you are looking for an enterprise tool or waterfall project with large programs, even the enterprise version is not sufficient. There's no significant difference from the basic version. The only thing that you really get is the ability to have multiple project reporting, but the reporting itself is limited. There are no configurable dashboards. You can report across multiple projects, which is great, but the type of reports that you can run are limited to the current set of built-in reports. That's not good enough for enterprise level with multiple project and large programs. You want multiple reports across multiple projects and you want the tailorability and configurability of having dashboards and analytics, which TestRail is weak on for the enterprise level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"The solution is stable."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

"It's very easy to use and simple with a low level of complexity. There are pros and cons with complex tools, but the advantage of TestRail is that it fits in really well with an agile life cycle."

"The most valuable features of TestRail by Gurock are the user experience, it's very easy to learn. There is no learning curve needed to work on projects and manage the test cases, it is easy. Exporting and importing are simple."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"The biggest advantage of using TestRail is its simplicity and intuitive interface."

"The product helps us create test cases and reports."

"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"I would like to see better customer support."

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."

"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."

"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"The reports should be more user-friendly."

"The analytics and reporting capabilities in TestRail are not very extensive and tailorable. This doesn't make it very suitable for enterprise level programs."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design. The API requires data to be sent in a specific format, which takes time to build. Additionally, the repor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

I use CucumberStudio as a test case repository. All of our test cases are stored there. It is also part of our test planning process. For every sprint, we plan the test cases in CucumberStudio and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hiptest?

For teams following a BDD style software development approach, CucumberStudio is a great collaborative tool that covers all the basic requirements of a test management tool. I would rate CucumberSt...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

Pricing is reasonable for TestRail. It offers good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestRail by Gurock?

I'm running an agile release train and we use TestRail for agile testing, mostly for manual testing, to keep track of test statuses. We link it directly to our user stories and execute our test cas...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub CoPilot vs CucumberStudio

Compared 34% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs CucumberStudio

Compared 29% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 15% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestRail

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Test Ops vs TestRail

Compared 6% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

February 2026

Download CucumberStudio product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

January 2026

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

Hiptest

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.