Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CucumberStudio vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
28th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)
GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ömer Faruk TUFAN - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly interface and good documentation, but customer support could be made better
CucumberStudio is used to write test scenarios and implement codes CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface. The customer support was prompt, and the documentation was good. Using CucumberStudio in our workflow has sped up compatibility testing. I would like to see better customer…
Sathya Prasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances our productivity while coding and provides suggestions and reviews
If you're considering a complete CI/CD pipeline, you'll need to integrate various tools such as Jenkins for builds and ensure connectivity with platforms like AWS or Azure. All these aspects must be managed effectively. Therefore, it's essential to have a dedicated configuration management team to oversee and maintain the pipeline. We're working on developing our in-house AI tool. GitHub Copilot, closely integrated with Microsoft products like .NET, offers extensive support for various programming languages. For example, it supports a wide range of languages, while a customized tool might only cover around seventy percent of the same range. It definitely can do a little bit of statistical analysis and give recommendations. I would recommend considering GitHub Copilot. If you already use another tool, be aware of the migration effort required to switch to Copilot. Assess the process of adopting and onboarding Copilot to ensure a smooth transition. If you're moving from one tool to Copilot, you'll need to evaluate the migration effort involved. It’s essential to have early adopters to facilitate this process. Overall, I rate the solution a nine-point five out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The solution is stable."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
 

Cons

"I would like to see better customer support."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The problem arises when a bot is not well-designed, which frustrates customers."
"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
"The solution is costly."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiptest?
The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.
What needs improvement with Hiptest?
Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment.
What is your primary use case for Hiptest?
CucumberStudio is used to create a scenario of a mobile application that uses behavior-driven development. It is used to create scenarios in software development.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around $10 per month. While it offers significant productivity gains, lowering the price to $5 could encourage more users. If the price were lower, it might be mor...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement. Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for...
 

Also Known As

Hiptest
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.