CucumberStudio vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

SmartBear and GitHub are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. SmartBear is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0, while GitHub is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. SmartBear holds a 0.1% mindshare in RADS, compared to GitHub’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CucumberStudio

Read 9 CucumberStudio reviews

78 Views
42 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Read 24 GitHub CoPilot reviews

1,673 Views
1,548 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and GitHub CoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Ömer Faruk TUFAN

Software Test Engineer at MK Consultancy (UK) LTD.

May 10, 2024

User-friendly interface and good documentation, but customer support could be made better

CucumberStudio is used to write test scenarios and implement codes CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface. The customer support was prompt, and the documentation was good. Using CucumberStudio in our workflow has sped up compatibility testing. I would like to see better customer…

Read full review

Sathya Prasad

Director at Synechron

Jul 30, 2024

Enhances our productivity while coding and provides suggestions and reviews

If you're considering a complete CI/CD pipeline, you'll need to integrate various tools such as Jenkins for builds and ensure connectivity with platforms like AWS or Azure. All these aspects must be managed effectively. Therefore, it's essential to have a dedicated configuration management team to oversee and maintain the pipeline. We're working on developing our in-house AI tool. GitHub Copilot, closely integrated with Microsoft products like .NET, offers extensive support for various programming languages. For example, it supports a wide range of languages, while a customized tool might only cover around seventy percent of the same range. It definitely can do a little bit of statistical analysis and give recommendations. I would recommend considering GitHub Copilot. If you already use another tool, be aware of the migration effort required to switch to Copilot. Assess the process of adopting and onboarding Copilot to ensure a smooth transition. If you're moving from one tool to Copilot, you'll need to evaluate the migration effort involved. It’s essential to have early adopters to facilitate this process. Overall, I rate the solution a nine-point five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."

"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."

"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."

"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

Cons

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."

"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."

"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."

"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution's accuracy and relevance could be improved."

"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiptest?

The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

I would like to see better customer support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

CucumberStudio is used to write test scenarios and implement codes.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For personal accounts, it seems pricey. However, for organizations, it is a good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page. They can also improve the scope of CoPilot.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 43% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 14% of the time

Pega Platform vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Claude vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

October 2024

Download CucumberStudio product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

October 2024

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Also Known As

Hiptest

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

SmartBear

GitHub

Overview

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot

October 2024

Free Report: CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot

Find out what your peers are saying about CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.