Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CucumberStudio vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)
SmartBear TestComplete
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. CucumberStudio is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.0% compared to last year.
SmartBear TestComplete, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 6.5% mindshare, down 7.9% since last year.
Rapid Application Development Software
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ömer Faruk TUFAN - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2024
User-friendly interface and good documentation, but customer support could be made better
CucumberStudio is used to write test scenarios and implement codes CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface. The customer support was prompt, and the documentation was good. Using CucumberStudio in our workflow has sped up compatibility testing. I would like to see better customer…
Prakhar Goel - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 25, 2024
Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation
We have applications related to power plants, and we use the solution to do integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment."
"The product is stable for what we are currently using it for, and it is sufficient for us."
"The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."
"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."
"It allows us to test both desktop and web applications."
"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."
"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."
"The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them. The are other features that SmartBear TestComplete has but the competition widely has them as well."
 

Cons

"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"This solution could be improved by making it easier to visualize where there is a failure without having to look at it in detail."
"SmartBear products generally have a weak link when it comes to integration with other test management tools like Inflectra."
"The solution’s customer support should be improved."
"In the cross-browser domain, it has a few snags with Microsoft Edge and Chrome; although, these problems are not critical."
"During the distribution of our regression test cases, the control IDs are not always recognized correctly."
"To bring it up to a 10, I would be looking for the addition of some key functional API testing."
"Error handling features in the tool are a little limited."
"Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution's pricing is too high."
"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."
"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."
"It is approximately $6,000 a year."
"The product is becoming more and more expensive."
"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."
"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."
"It costs a few hundred per year, but I am not sure. It is not at all expensive as compared to other tools."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiptest?
The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.
What needs improvement with Hiptest?
I would like to see better customer support.
What is your primary use case for Hiptest?
CucumberStudio is used to write test scenarios and implement codes.
What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?
TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?
The solution's pricing is too high. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing nine and a half out of ten.
What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?
The learning curve of the solution's user interface is a little high for new users.
 

Also Known As

Hiptest
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.