Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BigQuery vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.6
Organizations saw 27% faster queries and 17% cost savings after one year using BigQuery for data management.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is praised for its stability, reliability, automatic recovery, and high uptime, earning excellent user ratings.
 

Setup Cost

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse offers flexible, scalable pricing based on CPU usage, with pay-as-you-go and hybrid solutions.
 

Categories and Ranking

BigQuery
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Autonomous Data Ware...
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of BigQuery is 9.1%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is 6.3%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

Sathishkumar Jayaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient large dataset handling with seamless service integration
BigQuery allows for very fast access, and it is efficient in handling large datasets compared to other SQL databases. It integrates well with other GCP products, and creating subscriptions in the UI is straightforward. The whole ecosystem of GCP products makes BigQuery beneficial for our data-handling tasks. Additionally, it is more cost-effective compared to alternatives like AWS.
Kwajah Mohiuddin - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides self-repair features, but the setup is complex
We use the product for online applications. We use it in the financial industry The product has self-repair features. The tool tunes itself. It separates compute from storage. We can scale storage and compute separately. The setup is complex. Oracle is a complex tool. I have been using Oracle…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Retailer
7%
Educational Organization
50%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BigQuery?
The initial setup process is easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigQuery?
We are above the free threshold, so we are paying around 40 euros per month for BigQuery. It is generally low cost.
What needs improvement with BigQuery?
Sometimes, support specialists might not have enough experience or business understanding, which can be an issue. They might have basic knowledge but lack specific insights related to the specific ...
What do you like most about Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?
With Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, things are much simpler. Creating a structure, initializing the servers, extending the servers, those are all things that are very, very easy. That's the main...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Hertz, TaylorMade Golf, Outront Media, Kingold, FSmart, Drop-Tank
Find out what your peers are saying about BigQuery vs. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.