Bitdefender GravityZone XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud comparison

The compared Bitdefender and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. Bitdefender is ranked #22 in XDR , with an average rating of 9.5, and holds a 0.6% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #3 in CWPP , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Read 5 Bitdefender GravityZone XDR reviews

512 Views
395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 74 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews

13,397 Views
10,996 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone XDR and Microsoft Defender for Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Wazuh and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR).

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (22nd)

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Container Management (9th), Container Security (4th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (3rd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (3rd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (4th), Compliance Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is designed for Extended Detection and Response (XDR) and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP), holds 13.0% mindshare, down 14.9% since last year.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

Featured Reviews

SimonClark

Cyber Security Advisor - Director at Fort Net UK

Good quality ransomware antivirus that provides automatic patch management

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is a good quality ransomware antivirus product. We like it because it's an industry-quality antivirus as opposed to some of the better-known ones like Symantec or Norton. Bitdefender has a better reputation for being up-to-date and picking up more threats. Patch management is important to keeping companies secure. The solution has an automatic patch management capability. Customers never find their software or operating systems vulnerable because Bitdefender would have automatically patched them. Bitdefender sells XDR and EDR products, but we tend to stop at the EDR level. BitDefender has lots of modules if people want to pay for them. We primarily push encryption patching and antivirus and integrate that into the security operations center.

Read full review

Vibhor Goel

Senior Cloud Platform Engineer at Deutsche Börse

A single tool for complete visibility and addressing security gaps

Currently, issues are structured in Microsoft Defender for Cloud at severity levels of high, critical, or warning, but these severity levels are not always right. For example, Microsoft might consider a port being open as critical, but that might not be the case for our company. Similarly, it might suggest closing some management ports, but you might need them to be able to log in, so the severity levels for certain things can be improved. Even though Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a way to temporarily disable certain alerts or notifications without affecting our security score, it would be better to have more granularized control over these recommendations. Currently, we cannot even disable certain alerts or notifications. There should be an automated mechanism to design Azure policies based on the recommendations, possibly with AI integration. Instead of an engineer having to write a policy to fix security gaps, which is very time-consuming, there should be an inbuilt capability to auto-remediate everything and have proper control in place. Additionally, enabling Defender for Cloud at the resource group level, rather than only at the subscription level, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability is pretty easy. It's easy to increase the capacity. You can just add on licenses to the existing license, and the duration of the license can be adjusted. For example, you've already bought a license for a year, and you want to add some more users. We can just add on licenses for the remaining period so that the entire organization can have the same expiry date. That makes renewal easier."

"The solution has an automatic patch management capability."

"I find that the auto-response capability is most valuable."

"I would rate GravityZone XDR more than nine out of ten."

"I appreciate the overall utilization of AI to enhance security posture."

"It provides an in-depth analysis and gives recommendations, along with a historical search capability."

"The HyperDetect feature in GravityZone XDR is effective."

"Microsoft Defender for Cloud helps in improving our overall security posture. We have a nice overview of what is missing where and what can be improved."

"I find Microsoft Defender for Cloud's KQL very flexible and powerful. It's really easy to search through with KQL queries to find the security breaches and incidents and to track down the breach itself."

"Defender for Cloud has improved our security posture."

"The most valuable feature is the hunting feature, which integrates well into the entire Microsoft ecosystem."

"The solution is used for risks, vulnerabilities, and compliance."

"The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available."

"The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative."

"It isn't a highly complex solution. It's something that a lot of analysts can use. Defender gives you a broad overview of what's happening in your environment, and it's a great solution if you're a Microsoft shop."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering a single panel for the management of all Bitdefender products. Additionally, there might be a need to simplify the interface in the future."

"Another area of improvement is CPU utilization. CPU utilization could be improved."

"The resource consumption is high for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, nearly using one gigabyte of RAM, especially on Windows 10 and 11."

"It's not very mature, and additional costs are involved."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The product could be improved by offering a single panel for the management of all Bitdefender products."

"The resource consumption is high for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, nearly using one gigabyte of RAM, especially on Windows 10 and 11."

"Customer service and support from Microsoft are very poor. Even for high-severity cases, response or resolution time can extend to three or four weeks."

"Azure's system could be more on point like AWS support. For example, if I have an issue with AWS, I create a support ticket, then I get a call or a message. With Azure support, you raise a ticket, and somebody calls back depending on their availability and the priority, which might not align with your business priority."

"When you work with it, the only problem that we're struggling with is that we have 21 different subscriptions we're trying to apply security to. It's impossible to keep everything organized."

"I felt that there was disconnection in terms of understanding the UI. The communication for moving from the old UI to the new UI could be improved. It was a bit awkward."

"Microsoft Graph needs improvement."

"The overview provides you with good information, but if you want more details, there is a lot more customization to do, which requires knowledge of the other supporting solutions."

"One of the main challenges that we have been facing with Azure Security Center is the cost. The costs are really a complex calculation, e.g., to calculate the monthly costs. Azure is calculating on an hourly basis for use of the resource. Because of this, we found it really complex to promote what will be our costs for the next couple of months. I think if Azure could reduce the complex calculation and come up with straightforward cost mapping that would be very useful from a product point of view."

"After getting a recommendation, it takes time for the solution to refresh properly to show that the problem has been eliminated."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"It's not the price of the software itself that makes it expensive. It's because you have to buy a VM; you have to buy additional hardware. All those things make it slightly costlier."

"I rate Microsoft Defender a three out of ten for affordability. The price could be a little lower."

"They have a free version, but the license for this one isn't too high. It's free to start with, and you're charged for using it beyond 30 days. Some other pieces of Defender are charged based on usage, so you will be charged more for a high volume of transactions. I believe Defender for Cloud is a daily charge based on Azure's App Service Pricing."

"The licensing is straightforward but can become expensive if you cover everything. You must balance the cost against the importance of what needs covering."

"Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters."

"I'm not privy to that information, but I know it's probably close to a million dollars a year."

"Although I am outside of the discussion on budget and costing, I can say that the importance of security provided by this solution is of such importance that whatever the cost is, it is not a factor."

"The product's pricing policy is generally favorable."

"I am not involved much with the pricing but the bundle offering is good."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Cloud Solution Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

Scalability is pretty easy. It's easy to increase the capacity. You can just add on licenses to the existing license, and the duration of the license can be adjusted. For example, you've already b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

The pricing of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

The product could be improved by offering a single panel for the management of all Bitdefender products. Additionally, there might be a need to simplify the interface in the future.

See all answers

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The entire Defender Suite is tightly coupled, integrated, and collaborative.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

The licensing is straightforward but can become expensive if you cover everything. You must balance the cost against the importance of what needs covering.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 69% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

Compared 21% of the time

More Bitdefender GravityZone XDR Competitors

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Orca Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

February 2025

Download Bitdefender GravityZone XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

February 2025

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Bitdefender

Microsoft

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities, delivering comprehensive security insights tailored for knowledgeable audiences.

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR amplifies security operations across environments, ensuring high-level detection and response. It integrates seamlessly, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with its innovative threat intelligence. Efficiently designed, it addresses evolving threats, empowering IT professionals to maintain robust cyber defenses.

What are the most important features of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses behavioral analysis to accurately identify threats.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights for improved threat visibility.
Scalability: Adapts to different network sizes ensuring consistent protection.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automated response capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Bitdefender GravityZone XDR?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances overall threat readiness.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential losses from undetected attacks.
Operational Efficiency: Minimizes manual monitoring with automation.
Adaptability: Quickly adjusts to newer threats with flexible configuration.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR plays a crucial role in safeguarding sensitive data. Its integration enables institutions to combat sophisticated threats, ensuring compliance and data integrity without compromising operational efficiency.

Bitdefender

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.

The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Wazuh and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.