Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender for Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
631 followers
Start review

Top Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender for Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Defender for Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive security management, real-time threat protection, and seamless integration across multi-cloud environments, enabling enhanced visibility and proactive threat hunting to safeguard your digital assets effectively.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates seamlessly with Azure, providing AI-driven security management and comprehensive visibility. In comparison, Wiz offers an agentless framework and robust contextual risk prioritization, excelling in threat discovery and compliance management across cloud environments. Both have unique strengths appealing to tech buyers.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Wiz Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher setup cost, while Wiz offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in their initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher setup cost, while Wiz offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in their initial financial commitment.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud protection and compliance, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates securely with Azure, offering cost benefits for Microsoft-centric companies through machine learning threat detection. Both address distinct security needs in cloud environments.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, making the initial investment noticeably different between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, making the initial investment noticeably different between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates seamlessly within Azure, providing detailed insights and AI-based detections, ideal for Azure-centric organizations. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers rapid incident response and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing real-time threat detection and automated operations.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud typically incurs lower setup costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security may involve higher initial investment, highlighting cost differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud typically incurs lower setup costs, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security may involve higher initial investment, highlighting cost differences.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
AWS GuardDuty excels in threat detection and cost-effective monitoring, ideal for AWS environments, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides advanced threat protection and compliance in diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Defender shines in multi-cloud ecosystems, making GuardDuty attractive for AWS-centric users with cost concerns.
Download AWS GuardDuty vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
AWS GuardDuty incurs minimal setup costs, emphasizing affordability and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a more significant initial investment, highlighting comprehensive features and integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS GuardDuty incurs minimal setup costs, emphasizing affordability and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a more significant initial investment, highlighting comprehensive features and integration capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Orca Security excels with agentless SideScanning for deep cloud insights and prioritizes vulnerabilities based on exposure. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates deeply with Microsoft services, covering a broad range of workloads with comprehensive detection and response capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Orca Security Report
Orca Security offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud may involve more intricate initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Orca Security offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud may involve more intricate initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Illumio is favored for its micro-segmentation and real-time mapping, ideal for hybrid environments prioritizing simplicity in pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers cloud-native coverage, integrating deeply within the Microsoft ecosystem, appealing to those seeking extensive cloud protection and advanced features.
Download Illumio vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Illumio involves a higher initial setup cost, emphasizing upfront investment, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more accessible entry requiring lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Illumio involves a higher initial setup cost, emphasizing upfront investment, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more accessible entry requiring lower setup expenses.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless Azure integration, ideal for companies using Microsoft services. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security excels in detailed endpoint management for hybrid setups. Microsoft is cost-effective for Azure users, while CrowdStrike appeals with advanced threat response capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security requires a higher investment in setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security requires a higher investment in setup.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation specializes in micro-segmentation and integration, appealing to users seeking advanced security across multi-platform environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers extensive threat detection and remediation, ideal for users prioritizing integration with Microsoft services and broad cloud coverage.
Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud. Microsoft Defender for Cloud is noted for its affordability in initial setup costs, offering potential cost savings for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud. Microsoft Defender for Cloud is noted for its affordability in initial setup costs, offering potential cost savings for users.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers flexible pricing and robust support, appealing to smaller enterprises seeking container security. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides extensive features and native Azure integration, attracting businesses prioritizing functionality and comprehensive threat detection within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Aqua Cloud Security Platform incurs a high setup cost while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a lower setup expense, providing a distinct cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform incurs a high setup cost while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a lower setup expense, providing a distinct cost-effective alternative.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels in email-specific protections and API integration for threat prevention. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive cloud security management with deep Microsoft integration, making it ideal for users prioritizing broader security oversight.

Download Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration involves a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a lower initial setup expense. The key distinction lies in the varied initial financial commitments required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration involves a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a lower initial setup expense. The key distinction lies in the varied initial financial commitments required for each solution.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cisco Secure Workload
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Workload excels in comprehensive security features, offering competitive pricing and robust network-centric security. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides superior Azure service integration, streamlined deployment, and cloud-native capabilities, offering a comprehensive feature set despite higher costs.
Download Cisco Secure Workload vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Cisco Secure Workload typically incurs higher setup costs, making it less affordable for budget-conscious users, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more economical setup option, providing better cost efficiency for organizations with tighter financial constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Workload typically incurs higher setup costs, making it less affordable for budget-conscious users, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more economical setup option, providing better cost efficiency for organizations with tighter financial constraints.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP excels in comprehensive IAM and asset management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates seamlessly with Azure and hybrid environments. Tech buyers might choose CloudGuard for its granular controls, while others select Defender for its integration and multi-cloud protection.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a streamlined setup process, highlighting the balance between affordability and efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a streamlined setup process, highlighting the balance between affordability and efficiency.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers intuitive anomaly detection and compliance reporting, ideal for those valuing easy monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in Azure integration, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive threat detection and a unified security overview across cloud environments.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a flexible setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud features a straightforward setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a flexible setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud features a straightforward setup option.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security excels in multi-cloud capabilities, providing robust real-time detection and a streamlined dashboard. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates seamlessly within Microsoft 365, offering strong regulatory compliance and threat intelligence, though non-Microsoft cloud support could improve.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security shows significantly lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, providing a more economical option for initial implementation. Microsoft Defender for Cloud, however, involves a higher setup investment, potentially offering additional fea...
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security shows significantly lower setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, providing a more economical option for initial implementation. Microsoft Defender for Cloud, however, involves a higher setup investment, potentially offering additional fea...
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
SUSE NeuVector excels in container security with affordable pricing, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing cost-effective protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive features and seamless Azure integration, appealing to businesses invested in Microsoft's ecosystem seeking advanced threat intelligence and hybrid environment coverage.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. SUSE NeuVector Report
SUSE NeuVector involves a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a more complex installation expense. The distinct installation experiences highlight a divergence in initial cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SUSE NeuVector involves a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a more complex installation expense. The distinct installation experiences highlight a divergence in initial cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is cost-effective and integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems; in comparison, Tenable Cloud Security provides extensive visibility and wider cloud support. Microsoft Defender enhances deployment ease, while Tenable's flexible configuration and comprehensive management attract businesses needing broader feature customization and platform compatibility.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Tenable Cloud Security Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a straightforward setup cost process, while Tenable Cloud Security requires more detailed configuration, highlighting a significant difference in their initial implementation efforts.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a straightforward setup cost process, while Tenable Cloud Security requires more detailed configuration, highlighting a significant difference in their initial implementation efforts.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in Azure ecosystem integration with automated incident response, while Qualys TotalCloud offers extensive vulnerability management. In comparison, Qualys provides comprehensive cloud-native security features, appealing to buyers needing real-time protection and structured pricing models.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Qualys TotalCloud Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Qualys TotalCloud presents a more complex setup process with potentially higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Qualys TotalCloud presents a more complex setup process with potentially higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security
4.0 out of 5
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers competitive pricing with strong cloud governance and easy deployment, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels with superior security features and a complex deployment, attracting companies focused on robust security, despite higher costs.
Download BMC Helix Cloud Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
BMC Helix Cloud Security requires a lower upfront setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering a cost-effective initial implementation. However, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides more comprehensive out-of-the-box security features, justifying its higher setup invest...
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Helix Cloud Security requires a lower upfront setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering a cost-effective initial implementation. However, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides more comprehensive out-of-the-box security features, justifying its higher setup invest...
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Panoptica
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Panoptica
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud seamlessly integrates with Azure, offering comprehensive threat protection. In comparison, Panoptica excels in Kubernetes security and microservices monitoring. Microsoft's ease of deployment attracts Azure users, while Panoptica appeals to those seeking wider container security. Pricing reflects their specialized capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers an upfront setup cost with structured pricing, while Panoptica presents a flexible setup fee with potential additional charges. These differences in setup costs highlight distinct approaches to implementing each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers an upfront setup cost with structured pricing, while Panoptica presents a flexible setup fee with potential additional charges. These differences in setup costs highlight distinct approaches to implementing each solution.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Trellix Cloud Workload Security
4.5 out of 5
Trellix Cloud Workload Security appeals to those seeking affordability and simplicity in deployment, with reliable support and efficient resource use. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud attracts tech buyers with its robust integration ecosystem and advanced security analytics, despite its higher cost and complex setup.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security Report
Trellix Cloud Workload Security incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Cloud Workload Security incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements for businesses.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
VMware Carbon Black Workload
1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Workload attracts tech buyers with its robust threat detection and efficient deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless Azure integration. VMware offers straightforward setup, while Microsoft excels in flexible pricing, appealing to businesses utilizing Azure services.
VMware Carbon Black Workload presents an affordable setup with straightforward implementation, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud features a moderate setup cost yet integrates seamlessly with existing Microsoft services.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Workload presents an affordable setup with straightforward implementation, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud features a moderate setup cost yet integrates seamlessly with existing Microsoft services.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless Azure integration and cost-efficiency for existing Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Plerion provides adaptable deployment with custom security features. Tech buyers may choose Defender for rapid Microsoft integration or Plerion for tailored, adaptable security across diverse environments.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an initial setup cost that integrates with existing Microsoft services, while Plerion's setup cost is typically lower, providing a cost-effective option for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an initial setup cost that integrates with existing Microsoft services, while Plerion's setup cost is typically lower, providing a cost-effective option for smaller enterprises.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Symantec Storage Protection
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Storage Protection focuses on data backup and recovery, ensuring integration across platforms. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers advanced threat protection and security management. A tech buyer might choose Symantec for cost-effectiveness and recovery or Defender for its enhanced cloud features.
Symantec Storage Protection has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering a more secure infrastructure versus Microsoft's more accessible pricing and seamless integration with Azure environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Storage Protection has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering a more secure infrastructure versus Microsoft's more accessible pricing and seamless integration with Azure environments.

Related categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
Vulnerability Management
Container Security