Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Bitdefender and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #27, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Bitdefender holds a 0.9% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Read 5 Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer reviews

415 Views
228 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Read 8 Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reviews

391 Views
251 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer are competing products in the advanced cybersecurity solutions space. Bitdefender has the upper hand with its extensive feature set offering higher value for the price.

Features: Trellix provides real-time threat intelligence, deep malware analysis, and consistent threat detection accuracy. Bitdefender offers comprehensive cloud-based analysis, automated threat detection mechanics, and broader analytical capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance its feature set and affordability. Bitdefender could improve customer support, hands-on interaction, and ease of deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix provides flexible deployment and strong personalized support. Bitdefender ensures efficient deployment with less hands-on customer interaction, maintaining a user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix has a higher initial setup cost but offers long-term security benefits and significant ROI through detection accuracy. Bitdefender, with its more affordable initial pricing, provides substantial value and a compelling ROI through its feature-rich portfolio.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

27th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is 0.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Basawaraj Vastrad

Technical Director at BD Software Distribution Pvt Ltd

Automated and manual threat analysis provides deep insights for potential threat remediation

The most valuable features of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer ( /products/bitdefender-sandbox-analyzer-reviews ) include manual and auto-submission. The sandbox analyzer provides a combination of technologies including machine learning-based technologies. Network analytics is performed, and the tool analyzes using threat feeds. Manual and automated submissions allow suspicious files or URLs to be analyzed thoroughly, providing deep insights for further investigation. This information is crucial for making informed decisions on remediating potential threats.

Read full review

HossamSelim

Vice- Head Of Math Department at a non-tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy to set up and use with a nice interface

The scalability could be better. We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats. In sandboxing, the time to respond is slower than we would like. We'd like them to be able to process faster. For example, Fortinet, they are doing 18,000 files per hour. For Wildfire, it is elastic. It can support as many files as you get. McAfee doesn't react like that. It does not support interfaces with HTTPS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use, and there is a lot of automation. So, users don't need to worry about that."

"Sandbox Analyzer is easy to use. It's simple to drill down into the data. In a lot of the competing products, an extremely informed end-user can do battle with the tools provided, but in today's market, end-users have less and less time to try and keep up. The CSAW alerts come out every day, and they're huge. Adobe did a master patch last Thursday and another one a few days later."

"Bitdefender has shown fantastic stability over the past eight years with no major incidents reported."

"The solution is useful in the event of a gray file or grayware, as there are certain files users may download of which we know little about."

"I like the fact that it works pretty well. It can be a little aggressive at times, but I'd rather have it be a little bit aggressive than not catch what it's supposed to catch. We've been running that platform for about five years, and we've not really had any viruses or malware get through. It's also easy to set up, and it's easy to manage."

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

"Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product."

"It is stable and reliable."

"It is very scalable."

"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

"It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."

Cons

"One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature."

"It should be more secure. There should be more protection, especially for non-signature-based malware. It works fine for non-signature-based malware, but I expect it to become a bit more advanced to be able to cope with future or upcoming environments."

"We propose the on-premises solution to most of our customers, for which we must provide a license, although no such request accompanies customers who want a cloud-based solution."

"It does everything we need. We haven't been able to throw anything at it that it couldn't handle."

"It would be better if there were real-time alerts. The whole suite, unlike most anti-virus consoles that just ping you when there's an infection or something, for some inexplicable reason, Bitdefender doesn't do that. The most you could do is get an hourly email, or maybe if there's an outbreak that affects 30% of our machines, it sends me an email. There's no real-time alert to say, "Hey, so-and-so literally 30 seconds ago just had this happen on their machine." Real-time reporting would be a huge improvement. All in all, it's a pretty nice product, generally speaking. They do a pretty good job. They can pretty much go toe to toe with just about anybody. But it's that kind of real-time nature. I've not had occasion to use the EDR portion to actually try and do any kind of custom scripting to drill into things that are going on at the endpoints. But my understanding from reading comments of others is that it's not particularly flexible in that regard to be able to do things like that."

"We would like to see the time it takes for the sandbox to analyze a file reduced from its ten or fifteen minute duration to five."

"There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client."

"The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign."

"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need a license to a certain extent. You need to pay for advanced features. For corporate accounts, it isn't is really a problem, but pricing is an important thing for many companies."

"I think it's probably less expensive than something like CrowdStrike. We got a really good deal because it was literally their year-end, and they were trying to close all the sales for the week. So we bought a three-year contract from them. It roughly ended up costing me somewhere around $17 for an endpoint per year. It was really quite a nice pricing. I've talked to other folks where they got CrowdStrike, and it's like $60 for an endpoint for a year. It does, and they can be pretty aggressive if you're dealing with them directly, and I have. So no complaints there."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I recommend this solution because of its ease of use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We use the solution for client management and security. We used the whole suite for client Firewall, antivirus, and everything provided by Trellix.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 100% of the time

More Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 51% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 49% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

March 2025

Download Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

March 2025

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is a security solution that enhances the organization posture against sophisticated or targeted attacks through advanced detection and reporting capabilities of elusive, persistent threats that try to penetrate your network.

Bitdefender

Powerful advanced threat detection

Uncover Hidden Threats

Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

Threat Intelligence Sharing

Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

Enable Investigation

Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

March 2025

Free Report: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.