Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Fortinet and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Fortinet is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Trellix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. Fortinet holds a 10.9% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Fortinet FortiSandbox
Read 38 Fortinet FortiSandbox reviews
  • 2,611 Views
  • 1,565 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Trellix Advanced Threat Def...
Read 8 Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reviews
  • 466 Views
  • 318 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Fortinet FortiSandbox and Trellix Advanced Threat Defense are competing products in the cybersecurity domain. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: Fortinet FortiSandbox offers dynamic analysis, seamless integration with Fortinet Security Fabric, and effective threat detection. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense includes machine-learning algorithms, proactive threat intelligence, and advanced analytics, providing strong zero-day threat protection.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiSandbox could enhance setup procedures, increase user-friendliness, and improve its customization options. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense could work on reducing its complexity, expanding integration capabilities, and enhancing flexibility in analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Advanced Threat Defense offers a streamlined deployment model, ensuring easy integration with existing systems and reliable customer service. Fortinet FortiSandbox might require more extensive installation steps and has varied user support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSandbox is known for its cost-effective setup and appealing ROI, attracting budget-conscious buyers. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense, although higher in initial cost, ensures long-term ROI through its robust features, offering greater perceived value for comprehensive security needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiSandbox
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Threat Deception Platforms (7th)
Trellix Advanced Threat Def...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
23rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiSandbox is 10.9%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 1.5%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

Kiarash Heydari - PeerSpot reviewer
Light and powerful solution design; useful to have
My impression is that the initial setup process is quite straightforward. If you know what you're using it for, the initial setup can be quite easy and the solution is not that hard to use. When it comes to the steps taken for the implementation, you would select the OS you're using and when the files are sent to the appliance you check, and in the appliance configuration, it must be like the visual governance environment. You must set up the OS you have so that appliance can scan or analyze your file. To maintain this solution, you must always have at least one all-around person tuning this solution.
Read full review
HS
Easy to set up and use with a nice interface
The scalability could be better. We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats. In sandboxing, the time to respond is slower than we would like. We'd like them to be able to process faster. For example, Fortinet, they are doing 18,000 files per hour. For Wildfire, it is elastic. It can support as many files as you get. McAfee doesn't react like that. It does not support interfaces with HTTPS.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"he solution's GUI is good."
"Integration is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. You can integrate even third-party solutions so that they can send the information or files they quarantine through the FortiSandbox"
"The scanner office document as well as PDF are useful. The most valuable thing is that you can emulate different operating systems without having the danger of getting something infected. It emulates several operating systems, and as a result, you either get the file or you don't get the file."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are the analysis options, artificial intelligence, and the many interfaces it provides."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox's most valuable feature is the security it provides against threats, such as ransomware. Additionally, it integrates well with APIs."
"The technical support is very good."
"The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis."
"The adapter is beneficial as it allows integration with various devices, not just Fortinet."
More Fortinet FortiSandbox pros
"It is stable and reliable."
"It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."
"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."
"Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product."
"It is very scalable."
"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."
"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."
 

Cons

"It can be difficult if you need to use the Command Line Interface (CLI). It's much easier if you only have to deal with the GUI."
"The reporting tools could be improved in Fortinet FortiSandbox."
"Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure."
"It would be better if it had support for Mac and Linux."
"The product is good but it could be speedier. In addition, it's quite complex."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox can improve by decreasing the time of analysis response. Other solutions have a better response time, such as WildFire."
"Not practical for real-time web traffic analysis because users won't wait for the FortiSandbox to complete its analysis before accessing content"
"I don't know if it is viable to do an improvement like this. When there are passwords in the password-protected files, it can't scan them or do things like this. I don't know if an algorithm or something else could make it better. Nowadays, many legitimate office documents have passwords."
More Fortinet FortiSandbox cons
"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."
"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."
"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."
"There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client."
"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."
"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."
"The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox is a nominally priced product, so I would not say that it is a very cheap tool."
"The solution is unavailable at a lower cost and can be difficult to deploy."
"The license for Fortinet FortiSandbox depends on the use case."
"The price of Fortinet FortiSandbox is not expensive."
"Altogether, it is about €10,000 for the Sandbox and Email Gateway."
"Fortinet is more reasonable than Palo Alto."
"We are on an annual license to use the solution. We have an additional feature that is integrated with S5, which is working well."
More Fortinet FortiSandbox pricing and cost advice
"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."
"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiSandbox?
The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSandbox?
I think it's affordable. For the six to seven months of usage, the cost has been reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSandbox?
We sometimes face a delay in email scanning due to not having multiple virtual machines. Improvements could be made in dynamic scanning, scanning all email components such as URLs and attachments, ...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?
I recommend this solution because of its ease of use.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?
There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?
We use the solution for client management and security. We used the whole suite for client Firewall, antivirus, and everything provided by Trellix.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Fortinet FortiSandbox
Compared 39% of the time
Check Point SandBlast Network vs Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
Check Point SandBlast Network vs Fortinet FortiSandbox
Compared 16% of the time
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Fortinet FortiSandbox
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Fortinet FortiSandbox
Compared 8% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Fortinet FortiSandbox
Compared 4% of the time
More Fortinet FortiSandbox Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense
Compared 40% of the time
More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiSandbox
December 2024
Fortinet FortiSandbox reportDownload Fortinet FortiSandbox product report
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
December 2024
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reportDownload Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report
 

Also Known As

FortiSandbox
McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
 

Learn More

Fortinet
Trellix
 

Overview

Fortinet FortiSandbox is a behavior-based threat detection solution that prevents and detects malicious code in files transferred within the organization. It is integrated with FortiGate firewalls and FortiMail for threat protection and can be used for monitoring and reporting. The solution inspects files in a virtual environment with different types of virtual machines and can block or quarantine files based on their score. 

The most valuable features include dynamic behavior analysis, manual scan features, easy management and configuration, fast scanning, scalability, customization, and ICAP protocol. The solution is cost-effective and faster than other sandbox solutions, with a good user interface.

Powerful advanced threat detection

Uncover Hidden Threats

Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

Threat Intelligence Sharing

Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

Enable Investigation

Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

 

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense
December 2024
Free Report: Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.