Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Fortinet and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Fortinet is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Trellix is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortinet holds a 11.4% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Read 38 Fortinet FortiSandbox reviews

2,489 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 38 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

1,278 Views
872 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Trellix Network Detection and Response and Fortinet FortiSandbox both operate in the cybersecurity realm, focusing on advanced threat detection and response. Trellix seems to have the upper hand in investigative depth and visibility, whereas Fortinet excels in integration with its product ecosystem.

Features: Trellix Network Detection and Response offers in-depth analysis tools, including the MVX engine and sandboxing technology, enabling advanced threat detection and forensic capabilities. It provides real-time investigation potential and integrates with other security measures for comprehensive security coverage. Fortinet FortiSandbox is known for its seamless integration with other Fortinet products and provides robust sandboxing environments for analyzing malicious files, along with the capability to emulate various operating systems, making it valuable for threat hunting.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Network Detection and Response could improve in managing false positives, customizing virtual environments, and better integrating with third-party solutions. Suggestions also include more straightforward analytics and simplified setup processes. Fortinet FortiSandbox users seek more virtual environment options and better integration beyond the Fortinet ecosystem. Enhancements in ease of using license management and speeding up analysis are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexible deployment options, whether on-premises, hybrid, or cloud. Trellix is recognized for its responsive technical support and extensive documentation, offering a variety of support contact methods. Fortinet is praised for effective technical support, but its deployment complexity can present challenges. Trellix's proficiency in support contrasts with Fortinet's focus on installation clarity.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Network Detection and Response is viewed as expensive, but its ROI is justified due to its advanced threat prevention capabilities, making the price barrier acceptable given the security it provides. Fortinet FortiSandbox is usually regarded as reasonably priced, though its licensing can be complex. Both solutions report significant ROI in threat prevention, with Fortinet having a competitive pricing edge despite Trellix's higher cost being backed by its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Deception Platforms (7th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiSandbox is 11.4%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 5.2%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Kiarash Heydari

Information security manager at asa com

Light and powerful solution design; useful to have

My impression is that the initial setup process is quite straightforward. If you know what you're using it for, the initial setup can be quite easy and the solution is not that hard to use. When it comes to the steps taken for the implementation, you would select the OS you're using and when the files are sent to the appliance you check, and in the appliance configuration, it must be like the visual governance environment. You must set up the OS you have so that appliance can scan or analyze your file. To maintain this solution, you must always have at least one all-around person tuning this solution.

Read full review

BiswabhanuPanda

Senior technical consultant at Hitachi Systems Micro Clinic

Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one

The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance it offers to users is good, making it useful for us in our company."

"The adapter is beneficial as it allows integration with various devices, not just Fortinet."

"Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"One of the valuable features is its ability to detect new threats."

"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are customization, ICAP protocol, and integration with other vendors. Additionally, the security work very well."

"It is a stable solution."

More Fortinet FortiSandbox pros

"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

"It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye."

"We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."

"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."

"If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline."

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection."

"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities."

"Fortinet FortiSandbox can improve by decreasing the time of analysis response. Other solutions have a better response time, such as WildFire."

"If you were to compare prices between vendors and manufacturers, you would see that the lowest equipment in the Sandbox line is quite expensive for a new customer."

"It should be easier to import custom virtual machines. Some of the VMs that are in FortiSandbox don't have the applications that we have in our environment. We need to import a VM with specific applications that we use in our environment. Have all the licenses because this is a real environment. You need a license for the Windows client you run on it. It's possible to import custom VMs, but it's a pain to do it. I would like a tool that simplifies the process."

"For additional features, maybe a form of execution pain files in a non-virtual environment because it has threats that identify when it is being run in a virtual machine."

"The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier."

"The reporting tools could be improved in Fortinet FortiSandbox."

More Fortinet FortiSandbox cons

"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."

"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."

"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

"It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning."

"They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use."

"It is not a very secure product."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is unavailable at a lower cost and can be difficult to deploy."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price of Fortinet FortiSandbox is expensive."

"There are additional costs, which isn't included in the licensing fee."

"The price of Fortinet FortiSandbox is not expensive."

"FortiSandbox is a subscription that can be purchased from Fortinet directly. Only using FortiSandbox as features purchased as a subscription in the cloud."

"The solution is affordable."

"I rate the product's pricing a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

More Fortinet FortiSandbox pricing and cost advice

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"The pricing is a little high."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiSandbox?

The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSandbox?

I think it's affordable. For the six to seven months of usage, the cost has been reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSandbox?

We sometimes face a delay in email scanning due to not having multiple virtual machines. Improvements could be made in dynamic scanning, scanning all email components such as URLs and attachments, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less r...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The solution's support needs to improve their support.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 39% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 5% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiSandbox Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 17% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 9% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox

January 2025

Download Fortinet FortiSandbox product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2024

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

FortiSandbox

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Learn More

Fortinet

Video not available

Trellix

Overview

Fortinet FortiSandbox is a behavior-based threat detection solution that prevents and detects malicious code in files transferred within the organization. It is integrated with FortiGate firewalls and FortiMail for threat protection and can be used for monitoring and reporting. The solution inspects files in a virtual environment with different types of virtual machines and can block or quarantine files based on their score.

The most valuable features include dynamic behavior analysis, manual scan features, easy management and configuration, fast scanning, scalability, customization, and ICAP protocol. The solution is cost-effective and faster than other sandbox solutions, with a good user interface.

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2024

Free Report: Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.