Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Fortinet FortiSandbox support is generally positive with responsive service, though some delays in tier escalation are reported.
Sentiment score
7.6
Trellix Network Detection and Response's customer service is rated highly for responsiveness, with room for improvement compared to competitors.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.0
Fortinet FortiSandbox needs better integration, improved usability, enhanced machine learning, easier deployment, and competitive pricing for customers.
Sentiment score
5.1
Trellix Network Detection and Response requires improvements in false positives, customization, integration, user interface, support, pricing, and collaboration.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable, with high ratings though some flexibility issues arise with hardware and license constraints.
Sentiment score
7.8
Trellix Network Detection and Response is scalable, effectively supporting various network sizes and user bases with few issues.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.6
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers competitive pricing but requires multiple licenses, varying costs, and is valued for data-sensitive enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.3
Trellix pricing is high for small enterprises, offering quality threat detection, competitive against some but not all rivals.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Fortinet FortiSandbox is stable and dependable, with high ratings for performance, scalability, and reliability, despite minor configurations.
Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Network Detection and Response is stable and robust, with occasional performance issues requiring regular updates for optimal functionality.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.7
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers advanced threat detection, integration, real-time analysis, and customization, enhancing enterprise network security against ransomware.
Sentiment score
7.2
Trellix Network Detection and Response offers advanced threat detection, real-time response, and automation for comprehensive network protection and security operations.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiSandbox
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Threat Deception Platforms (7th)
Trellix Network Detection a...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Network Detection and Response (NDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiSandbox is 10.9%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 4.9%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

Kiarash Heydari - PeerSpot reviewer
Light and powerful solution design; useful to have
My impression is that the initial setup process is quite straightforward. If you know what you're using it for, the initial setup can be quite easy and the solution is not that hard to use. When it comes to the steps taken for the implementation, you would select the OS you're using and when the files are sent to the appliance you check, and in the appliance configuration, it must be like the visual governance environment. You must set up the OS you have so that appliance can scan or analyze your file. To maintain this solution, you must always have at least one all-around person tuning this solution.
BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one
The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiSandbox?
The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSandbox?
I think it's affordable. For the six to seven months of usage, the cost has been reasonable.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSandbox?
We sometimes face a delay in email scanning due to not having multiple virtual machines. Improvements could be made in dynamic scanning, scanning all email components such as URLs and attachments, ...
What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less r...
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
The solution's support needs to improve their support.
 

Also Known As

FortiSandbox
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.