Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo

Trellix Network Detection and Response pros and cons

Vendor: Trellix
4.2 out of 5
2,667 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Trellix Network Detection and Response enhances security by providing excellent defense against zero-day threats and improved network security.
MVX Engine and sandboxing technology protect against signature-based and signature-less attacks.
Trellix seamlessly integrates with Splunk, improving visibility and response capabilities.
Automatic response to network incidents increases efficiency and security for users.
Installation is straightforward, and scalability is effective in high-bandwidth environments.

CONS

Pricing and detection capabilities are inadequate, especially in reporting and policy management.
Integration with other vendors' firewalls and proxies requires improvement for better API support and automatic file submissions.
Lack of cloud connectivity and advanced machine learning affects network threat detection.
Customization limitations in VM and sandbox configurations restrict user control over applications and operating systems.
Documentation is insufficiently available to customers, complicating configuration and implementation processes.
 

Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros review quotes

BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 4, 2024
We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment.
CEO8280 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2019
The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.
CS
May 18, 2021
It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye.
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Network Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AmgadYousry - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2022
The solution can scale.
AE
Feb 21, 2019
Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities.
reviewer1420032 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2020
It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.
reviewer2392089 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 26, 2024
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline.
SH
Jun 4, 2019
If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.
it_user886083 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2019
The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 18, 2025
Trellix NDR provides an essential defense by automatically responding to network incidents that firewalls may not catch.
 

Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons review quotes

BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 4, 2024
The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless.
CEO8280 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2019
The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right.
CS
May 18, 2021
Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone.
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Network Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AmgadYousry - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2022
It is an expensive solution.
AE
Feb 21, 2019
Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.
reviewer1420032 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2020
I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet.
reviewer2392089 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 26, 2024
If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job.
SH
Jun 4, 2019
It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment.
it_user886083 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2019
As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web).
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 18, 2025
The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response.