Check Point SandBlast Network vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Trellix Network Detection and Response and Check Point SandBlast Network are competing solutions in the network detection and response category. Trellix has an edge due to advanced threat detection features and strong incident response capabilities, while Check Point is noted for its versatile threat handling and AI/ML integration.

Features: Trellix NDR offers advanced malware detection, zero-day threat capabilities, MVX for virtualized execution, and sandboxing technologies. Incident response and deep threat insights are notable. Check Point SandBlast excels in handling various file types, combining signature-based and zero-day threat prevention with robust Threat Extraction and Emulation features.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could improve integration, reporting options, and reduce false positives. Enhanced user customization and cloud integration are needed. Check Point SandBlast requires better support responsiveness, pricing clarity, and more intuitive configuration. Both products need adaptation to changing cyber environments and improved interoperability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix NDR is primarily on-premises with high customer service ratings for responsiveness. Check Point SandBlast offers hybrid and cloud options with slightly lower service ratings due to support delays and deployment complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix NDR is seen as expensive but justifies cost with effective breach prevention and substantial ROI. Check Point SandBlast, also with a higher cost for advanced features, is competitively priced, offering favorable ROI through comprehensive threat management.