Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1, while Trellix is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.4. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 6.7% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Check Point SandBlast Network
Read 36 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews
  • 1,422 Views
  • 939 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 38 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 1,444 Views
  • 986 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Trellix Network Detection and Response's customer service is rated highly for responsiveness, with room for improvement compared to competitors.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.1
Trellix Network Detection and Response requires improvements in false positives, customization, integration, user interface, support, pricing, and collaboration.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Network Detection and Response is scalable, effectively supporting various network sizes and user bases with few issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Trellix pricing is high for small enterprises, offering quality threat detection, competitive against some but not all rivals.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
Trellix Network Detection and Response is stable and robust, with occasional performance issues requiring regular updates for optimal functionality.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.7
Trellix Network Detection and Response offers advanced threat detection, real-time response, and automation for comprehensive network protection and security operations.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Network Detection a...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Network Detection and Response (NDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 6.7%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 5.1%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

AshleyMorales - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps detect and prevent attacks and offer helpful sandbox analysis
The configuration could be optimized. The usability could improve. They need to make the guides more specific with images, as it is very complicated to guess where each option is located. The management of alerts could improve them a bit - especially in event management. In terms of performance, at some point, I have come to feel that it drops during certain hours. Some additional features that can be added may be the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML).
Read full review
BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one
The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
11%
Security Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point SandBlast Network?
The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?
As of now, everything is good enough.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?
The cost is a little bit high-end, and you need to get precise performance metrics in order to get the correct size. Improvements are required in both areas of the tool.
See all answers
What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less r...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
The solution's support needs to improve their support.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 52% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 28% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 6% of the time
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 5% of the time
More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 20% of the time
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 16% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 8% of the time
Arista NDR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Arista NDR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
November 2024
Check Point SandBlast Network reportDownload Check Point SandBlast Network product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Network Detection and Response
October 2024
Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Learn More

Check Point Software Technologies
Video not available
Trellix
 

Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

 

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response
October 2024
Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.