Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs Digital Guardian comparison

BlackBerry and Fortra are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #78, while Fortra is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8. BlackBerry holds a 0.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Fortra’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Read 2 Blackberry Dynamics Apps reviews

62 Views
31 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

1,115 Views
715 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Digital Guardian

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and Blackberry Dynamics Apps are competing in the enterprise security solutions category. While Digital Guardian is appreciated for its data protection capabilities, Blackberry Dynamics Apps stands out with superior overall functionality.

Features: Digital Guardian offers strong data loss prevention, granular policy controls, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Blackberry Dynamics Apps includes robust mobile device management, secure container capabilities, and integrated productivity tools. The key difference is Digital Guardian’s depth in data protection versus Blackberry’s extensive mobile management features.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian could enhance mobile platform support, simplify policy management, and better address mobile integration. Blackberry Dynamics Apps could benefit from more intuitive management tools, faster performance, and focus on usability and speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Blackberry Dynamics Apps, although more complex to deploy, provides excellent customer service. The main distinction lies in ease of deployment, with Digital Guardian being simpler to implement.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian is considered cost-effective with a strong return on investment due to its data protection capabilities. Blackberry Dynamics Apps, while higher in price, delivers significant ROI through superior mobile management features. Blackberry offers greater ROI for mobile-centric environments, whereas Digital Guardian is optimal for data protection priorities.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

78th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

41st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (11th), Endpoint Encryption (9th), Mobile Data Protection (7th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"It has been scalable."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

More Digital Guardian pros

Cons

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"Technical support could be better."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

More Digital Guardian cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

April 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Overview

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian

March 2025

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Digital Guardian report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.