

Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter compete in the field of software testing automation. Based on the features, BlazeMeter seems to have the upper hand as it provides versatile performance testing capabilities, including cloud-based load generation and comprehensive reporting, which can be more appealing for large-scale testing environments.
Features: Tricentis Tosca provides model-based test automation without scripting, supports various technologies, and is efficient for testing complex scenarios, especially for SAP and Java applications. It offers reusable data classes and enhanced test case management visualization. BlazeMeter focuses on performance testing with cloud load generators, supporting various testing tools for scalable distributed load testing, enabling effective testing for web servers.
Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca needs to improve its UI and technology-specific test case authoring. Handling of upgrades and integration with third-party ALMs could be better. BlazeMeter should enhance integration with existing tools, refine reporting capabilities, improve real-time metrics analysis, and faster initiation of load generation. Also, addressing the performance of load generator provisioning and insights into test failures is needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployment but has mixed customer service reviews, with strong on-site but inconsistent remote assistance. BlazeMeter provides flexible deployment with strong cloud support and generally well-rated customer service with quick resolution times and good client accessibility.
Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca has a high cost and complex licensing, posing challenges for smaller businesses, although its capabilities often justify the investment with substantial efficiency gains. BlazeMeter is more budget-friendly with flexible licensing and consumption-based pricing, offering good value for extensive load testing and supporting distributed testing at a lower cost compared to competitors.
Tasks that typically take ten hours are reduced to two to three hours, representing a threefold productivity gain.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
The overall competence of the support has declined; previously, the support was very good, but recently, it has become difficult to reach them and get solutions, and it's taking a lot of time.
My experience has been positive; their response to emails or phone calls in tech support is fast, usually between eight to ten hours.
There is no way to mark the importance or criticality of incidents when creating them.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It covers a breadth of applications and products, demonstrating excellent scalability that I have seen in reality.
Scalability is excellent with Tricentis Tosca.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
For performance and stability, Tricentis Tosca deserves a 10 out of 10.
The stability of Tricentis Tosca is rated ten out of ten. It is very stable.
I find stability issues when using the Vision AI feature; Tricentis Tosca is not very stable.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
The self-healing process should automatically handle any changes in web applications; for instance, if properties change inside the application, the tool should automatically take care of it, unlike other tools such as Mabl and TestComplete that have better self-healing capabilities.
The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work.
Moving to a cloud-based application rather than a desktop one could improve Tosca.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense.
A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
It allows for drag-and-drop functionality and demo automation in SAP-based applications, which can be challenging with other automation tools.
The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy.
The modular approach reduces scripting effort by at least fifty percent, which significantly cuts down on the script development time.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 14.2% |
| BlazeMeter | 1.2% |
| Other | 84.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 72 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.
Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.
What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.