Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlueJeans Rooms vs ON24 Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Rooms
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ON24 Platform
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Events Platforms (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of BlueJeans Rooms is 0.1%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ON24 Platform is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

ZN
User-friendly, simple to set up, and the screen sharing is easy to do
We are using BlueJeans Rooms for virtual meetings. It is very helpful and we use it to have sessions for requirements gathering and testing. I use it both on my laptop and mobile phone The interface is user-friendly and screen sharing is easy to do. If multiple people are part of the meeting and…
RF
Friendly user interface, simple navigation; suitable for small and large webinars
One thing that could be improved is that there is a 5,000 person limit. Exceeding that requires an additional fee and requires purchasing additional cloud space. It's difficult because you never know on the day how many people will join. The reporting could also be improved because it sometimes requires putting in a request for additional information. If reporting were more in-depth that could be avoided. I think the next release could include something related to bandwidth optimization because I log in from three devices, iPhone, mobile and laptop to check. There was some lag with the mobile.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The interface is user-friendly and screen sharing is easy to do."
"Friendly user interface and simple navigation."
"The solution works well with third-party integrations."
 

Cons

"If multiple people are part of the meeting and they are in the same room, for example on their laptops, then it will create an echo and the other person may not be audible."
"The solution needs a more modern interface."
"Bandwidth optimization could be increased."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We paid $1,800 for five webinars, which is the standard fee. If you require support there is a $300 additional fee, extra attendees is an additional fee, integration is an additional fee, etc. All these extras could add on another $2,500 which was not in our budget."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Media Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Legal Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pernod Ricard
IBM, Zendesk, Salesforce, Linkedin, Intel
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.