Board vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

SAS Activity-Based Management and Board are competing products in financial analysis and performance management. Data suggests while SAS Activity-Based Management excels in pricing and support, Board is superior in features, appealing to those seeking comprehensive capabilities.

Features: SAS Activity-Based Management offers robust cost management, process optimization, and OLAP data extraction with export capabilities. It is designed for specific accounting projects such as cost allocation and transfer pricing. Board is known for its versatile planning, simulation features, and the ability to perform multidimensional analyses. It offers flexibility and ease of use, enabling customization without IT training.

Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management could enhance feature variety and user interface intuitiveness. Increasing flexibility in customizing modules and expanding integration options would be beneficial. Board could benefit from simplifying its deployment process and improving initial setup efficiency. More extensive training resources and reducing reliance on customization for advanced tasks could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management provides a straightforward deployment model with commendable customer service, appealing to businesses needing smooth integration. Board’s deployment is more complex, but its comprehensive support services aid in easing the transition, compensating for the complexity.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management is noted for competitive setup costs and solid ROI, attractive to cost-conscious businesses. Although Board has higher initial costs, it offers compelling ROI through advanced features, providing significant long-term value.