Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Brinqa vs Nucleus comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
65th
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
Brinqa
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
41st
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (32nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (16th)
Nucleus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
49th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (38th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Zafran Security?
Share your opinion
RB
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.
Use Nucleus?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
University
9%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Retailer
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Brinqa?
The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Brinqa?
I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some add...
What needs improvement with Brinqa?
Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow i...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.