Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nucleus vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Nucleus
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (38th), Vulnerability Management (50th)
Rapid7 InsightVM
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Nucleus is 2.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightVM is 18.8%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Nucleus?
Share your opinion
Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2022
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
Our company uses the Nexpose automation tools for validity, deactivation, assessment, and penetration testing. We can easily see if something has been exposed and manually focus on or follow main vulnerabilities.  We have 28 users and a JV license key for using the solution in our offline systems…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."
"The license is IP based. How many IPs you are using to scan is the amount of the license you have to buy. The number of users doesn't matter; many users can use it or only person. It depends on the culture of the organization."
"The licensing is asset-based and very straightforward."
"We purchase annual licenses."
"A full license for the solution is expensive because it is at the organizational level and not by individual users."
"Comparing the price with the value that we receive, I am not happy with it."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"It is pretty expensive. It depends on what you consider pricey, however, if you only look at vulnerability management solutions, such as within VM or VMDR, there are, I suppose the prices are almost the same. But I believe you will discover that for yourself."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
 

Also Known As

No data available
InsightVM, NeXpose
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.