Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Armis vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (3rd), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (4th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Rapid7 InsightVM
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Armis is 3.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightVM is 19.8%, up from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a very good vulnerability monitoring system, but the implementation is challenging
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
The solution cannot scan third-party tools that have firewalls within them. The firewalls detect and block the solution. Conversely, Nexus is able to bypass firewalls because it has low detectability. We use Nexus when the solution cannot bypass a firewall. The solution can scan 60% of the time but Nexus can scan 90% of the time. The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results. Nexus has a good, long range and a good database for finding CVC numbers. We need this level of security detail but the solution does not seem to provide it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup and deployment were simple."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"It determines which assets and devices are at risk, alerts you if there's a risk, and categorizes all assets, including personal computers, mobile phones, servers, televisions, cars, and video game consoles."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"The solution’s vulnerability monitoring system is very good."
"The technology is good."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"The most valuable feature for me is the risk calculation based on monthly effects."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution is very user friendly and easy to manage."
"The product is scalable."
"I rate InsightVM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. It takes two or three engineers to deploy. The solution requires some maintenance. It's mainly cleaning up data."
"We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
 

Cons

"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"We face issues during implementation."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"The product does not have the capability to do dynamic scanning of non-web applications."
"I would like to see more integration."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"We found that after you passed an endpoint, it didn't always reflect it in the next scan. I'm not sure if it was a glitch or some issue with the product's software. That was never clear. That was always an issue and something that definitely needed improvement."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."
"A full license for the solution is expensive because it is at the organizational level and not by individual users."
"It is less expensive compared to other competitors."
"The license is annual and this is the optimal approach when it comes to most software."
"Its licensing is yearly. Everything is included in the price for one year."
"In some cases, we procure the licenses. In some cases, the customers directly buy the license from Rapid7."
"Our licensing costs are somewhere around $40,000 annually. There are no additional fees."
"The solution is a bit more reasonably priced than other products."
"The license is IP based. How many IPs you are using to scan is the amount of the license you have to buy. The number of users doesn't matter; many users can use it or only person. It depends on the culture of the organization."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
41%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Armis?
Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.
What needs improvement with Armis?
There isn't anything specific that needs improvement.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I used it for asset management in my cybersecurity training program called CyberNow Labs. It was used during security operations and investigations to identify assets within our CNL network and to ...
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
 

Also Known As

No data available
InsightVM, NeXpose
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Rapid7 InsightVM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.