Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Brinqa vs OctoXLabs comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brinqa
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (56th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (48th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (49th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (18th)
OctoXLabs
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Brinqa is designed for Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
OctoXLabs, on the other hand, focuses on Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM), holds 2.5% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.
Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Brinqa0.5%
Wiz6.6%
Tenable Nessus5.1%
Other87.8%
Vulnerability Management
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OctoXLabs2.5%
Axonius28.5%
Armis17.9%
Other51.1%
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
 

Featured Reviews

RB
Cybersecurity Director at RB Consultancy
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.
Use OctoXLabs?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Retailer
15%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Tenable, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: January 2026.
881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.