Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

Broadcom and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #21. Broadcom holds a 3.1% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Read 20 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews

336 Views
164 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Central

Read 9 OpenText Silk Central reviews

263 Views
171 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

OpenText Silk Central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are both prominent tools for requirements management and testing. Users report greater satisfaction with OpenText Silk Central's feature set and cost-effectiveness, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is valued for its comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Silk Central is highly praised for its robust test management features, user-friendly navigation, and efficient execution tracking. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer stands out with its in-depth modeling, automation functionalities, and extensive requirement coverage.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central could benefit from enhanced reporting tools, better integration with other platforms, and modernized user interface design. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer users suggest more streamlined updates, reduced system resource usage, and improved speed of operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, ensuring minimal downtime. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has a more complex setup but offers detailed documentation and proactive support teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central offers competitive pricing with solid ROI due to its efficient test management capabilities. Comparatively, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, though more expensive, justifies the additional investment by delivering high ROI through extensive features and automation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Design Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (8th)

OpenText Silk Central

Ranking in Test Management Tools

21st

Ranking in Test Design Automation

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Gireesh Subramonian

Assistant Director at Ernst & Young

Jan 13, 2019

Helps the development team to finish tasks within the required timeframe

The team I am working with was never into Agile before. We have a daily scrum-call and before that, we have to define all the tasks that we are going to work on for a number of sprints. For example, there is a Product Increment Planning meeting where we put all the user requirements into the product backlog. Then we put them back to the respective sprints. A product increment consists of about five iterations, or five sprints. And we pull each of these backlog items to these particular sprints or iterations, so that it is easy for the development team to pick up, based on the priority. The backlog is set, and it is pulled into particular sprints, based on business priority. So it helps the development team to take up and finish tasks within the required timeframe. It helps in productivity, traceability, and saves time.

Read full review

it_user685080

Test Governance at Poste Italiane

Apr 2, 2019

A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions

We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The optimization technique helps in giving us the minimum number of test cases with maximum coverage."

"CA ARD has some beautiful features which I haven't found anywhere else. For example, when designing or creating our test cases and doing scenarios, we are able to restrict our flows. If we take a data link between two processes, we can actually restrict it, so that, in production, if our functionality breaks down, we can restrict that and all the flows related to it will be removed from the test data set."

"Integration with automation is one of the reasons we started to consider moving to this tool from our original tool for implementing test modeling. ARD appears to have better integration with Selenium. It also has the ability to record scripts/flows using Selenium Builder and import them into ARD, which will then create and optimize a model based on that."

"I like the way Broadcom ARD inserts test cases in execution mode. Also, ARD can be used apart from Broadcom TDM. It's an add-on through which you supply data through ARD test cases when there is a need for extra data."

"The support that we get from Broadcom is great."

"Measuring test coverage helps in one of the most challenging tasks. It has logic that can help to select the right set of scenarios and know what coverage it will provide."

"It helped us to move from manual testing to automation testing."

"In terms of meeting business challenges, it helped to shorten the dev/testing cycle by identifying requirements gaps early in the process, by having models shared within the development team. It helped increase test coverage and reduce the number of issues experienced by clients/customers."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer pros

"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."

Cons

"CA ARD doesn't provide integration with Tosca. The possibility of creating a test case and exporting it into Tosca is not available. Integration with end-to-end automation tools, like Worksoft or Tosca, is not provided by CA ARD as of now."

"At present, there is no option for test data parameters from ARD for virtual databases. We have to create them in TDM and push them as well. Virtual database connectivity needs to be improved. They need to come up with some areas where they can create synthetic data parameters easily from the test cases that have been designed."

"They do not have an engine to house test scripts to really pull together the testing pieces of it."

"Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around."

"A template in App Test should be created in advance. This has proven to be time consuming. The process is not fully automated, because there is a lot of manual intervention is required."

"The solution could improve security and authentication."

"Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer could improve the UI. Other solutions have a much better UI. The new UI should have a new modern framework."

"Integration with Agile management tools can be improved, i.e., mainly test case maintenance and linking test cases to the automation script."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer cons

"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This tool reduces the cost associated with test cases, automation script generation, and maintenance costs."

"At present, Broadcom works through partners rather than dealing directly with the consumer. When there are discounts given, it's up to the partner as to whether they want to give that discount to the customer. Sometimes, the partners decide to take the discount themselves. Pricewise, I would give ARD's price a rating of three out of five."

"The cost of the tool was well worth the benefit that we saw on the back-end."

"It is less costly when compared to other tools on the market."

"Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."

"The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs."

"We were able to scale down some resources to basically self-fund our ability to purchase the tool."

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

The most valuable features of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are ease of use, saving time for the team who builds test cases, and visibility of test cases.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer could improve the UI. Other solutions have a much better UI. The new UI should have a new modern framework.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 46% of the time

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 28% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 26% of the time

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Silk Central

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Silk Central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

November 2024

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

October 2024

Download OpenText Silk Central product report

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer

Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central

Learn More

Broadcom

OpenText

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank

AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central

October 2024

Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.