Broadcom Payment Security vs Kount comparison

Broadcom Payment Security

Read 3 Kount reviews

624 Views
201 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Broadcom Payment Security and Kount are competing in the payment security sector. Kount holds the upper hand by providing robust fraud prevention and AI-driven analytics.

Features: Broadcom Payment Security offers comprehensive encryption, tokenization, and sensitive data protection. Kount delivers AI-driven analytics, real-time fraud detection, and flexible deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Payment Security integrates seamlessly with financial systems and provides strong customer support. Kount offers a cloud-based solution for simplified deployment but slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Payment Security typically has lower upfront costs, offering favorable ROI. Kount's pricing is relatively higher, resulting in longer ROI periods, but offers advanced fraud prevention tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Payment Security vs. Kount Report (Updated: March 2025).

Broadcom Payment Security vs. Kount

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

28th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kount

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kount is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

it_user432621

Digital fraud strategy manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization.

All 3DS systems assess the risks of all transactions, including closed cards. This drives additional workload for operations. Having said that, CA’s partnership with several authorization providers, such as TSYS, will help us to eradicate this issue. These 3DS secure systems act independently from a bank’s man authorisation system ( Falcon, TSYS, SAS Raptor etc), and as a result they end up in position where they end up attempting to authenticate transactions that are closed card as they have no visibility of these type of statuses. This essentially means that these fraud system generate alerts on closed card , wasting operational resource. This is the same for all systems in this space inc RSA. Having said that there have been recent developments in this space that have allowed authorisation platform to work together with the 3DS system via an API. Meaning that the 3DS system can pass the data to the Authorisation system who in turn will make the decision, instead of the decision being made via a 3DS platform. One example of this is the TSYS/CA relationship.

Read full review

Chris Zappato

Fraud Analyst at Pinterest

Features a large database of fraud signals and indicators to stop fraud in its tracks

At my old company, I used to use a tool called Sift. It's another great tool, but I prefer Kount. The major differences between the two solutions are how they're laid out and how fast you can gather as much information as possible. I personally prefer Kount — that's my personal preference. I've worked with both platforms for many years. I personally prefer Kount for the way that they display information and for the variety and flexibility they offer when it comes to the rules — from very simple to very complex. Kount is better designed for catching fraud, detecting fraud, and preventing fraud. Sift is also great; you will not go wrong if you go with Sift, but I personally prefer Kount.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."

"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"

"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."

"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."

"It's an in-depth, all-in-one solution."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to create your own ruleset and edit it whenever you want. Their reporting functionality is very helpful. It's really robust."

"The initial setup was absolutely straightforward. Within a week I was fully working."

Cons

"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."

"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."

"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."

"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."

"They could do a little bit better with chargeback management. There are other solutions out there that I've heard about, like Accertify that have a better chargeback platform where they're integrated more with the banks or in terms of how the workflow is and how you can respond to chargebacks."

"The rule system and automation could be expanded a little bit more."

"The time that is taken to go to Kount and come back should be in the order of around 100 milliseconds or less. And our context was taking around 200 to 300 milliseconds. We didn't want the extra load of 100 milliseconds to happen, so if the two rounds of stability could be cut to one, that would be very helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."

"I think the pricing is great — I think it's totally worth what they're charging because the benefits are great."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security

Compared 100% of the time

More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors

Riskified vs Kount

Compared 46% of the time

Forter vs Kount

Compared 33% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs Kount

Compared 20% of the time

More Kount Competitors

Product Reports

Broadcom Payment Security

Download Broadcom Payment Security product report

Download Kount product report

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite

No data available

Overview

Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

Broadcom

Kount’s patented machine learning technology analyzes transactions to stop fraud and increase revenue for online businesses, merchants, acquiring banks, and payment service providers.

Sample Customers

Eurocard

CD Baby, Crate & Barrel, Domino's Pizza, Dunkin' Brands, Hydrobuilder, Jagex, JOANN Fabric & Crafts, Leatherman, Micro Center, Staples, The Iconic, The Source, The Vitamin Shoppe, TickPick and WebJet.

Broadcom Payment Security vs. Kount