Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Orchestrated Service Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Orchestrated Service Virtua...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 36.2%, up from 33.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Orchestrated Service Virtualization is 5.7%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1247823 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good
We have great support, even though we do not have an enterprise agreement. In terms of stability and scalability, if we have had any issues, we have great support. With support, it depends on the level. If it is level one, you can call. If it is level two, they will issue a support ticket and it will be addressed within 8 to 12 hours. Tier three and tier four is knowledge-based, and you are referred to their portal, and also communities. We can look into it and search for customers with similar issues, and they have detailed solutions. If you are not able to resolve your issue then the support team will assist you with your issue.
reviewer949782 - PeerSpot reviewer
Live connectivity benefits but is lacking customization options
Our primary use of the solution is for mocking of API codes One feature we like is the live connectivity of the product. In other words, you can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data. We haven't used the product…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Easy to understand ways of creating stubs."
"Helps us to remove barriers that we have with dependencies on services that we don't own, or services that don't even exist yet."
"We had a number of back-end services that were not available during testing times. What this had allowed us to do is get our early life testing done while those services are not available."
"Ability to vary the responses very easily (randomize, pick-lists, etc.)."
"Unit testing or early life testing did not have to be stopped or delayed because those services were not available."
"You can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then, the more technical that you are, the more programming you have, the more you're able to customize the tool."
"The most valuable feature is that it supports so many protocols. We, being a large bank, have almost all the protocols, and it supports all of them, so that's one good thing."
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET."
"You can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."
 

Cons

"They can always work on usability and making simple things simple to do. This is true of every product that deals with complexity."
"It is not a stable solution."
"CA actually releases a new version every year. We had issues with the upgrade prior to the latest one."
"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."
"​From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. They need more knowledge about the connectivity to DevOps orchestration."
"The initial setup was complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
38%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Allianz, Siemens, Bosch, Commerz Real, Toyota
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.