No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Service Virtualization (1st)
ReadyAPI Test
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (20th), Regression Testing Tools (10th), API Testing Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Broadcom Service Virtualization is designed for Service Virtualization and holds a mindshare of 26.7%, down 33.3% compared to last year.
ReadyAPI Test, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 2.3% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization26.7%
Parasoft Virtualize25.7%
OpenText Service Virtualization15.9%
Other31.700000000000003%
Service Virtualization
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ReadyAPI Test2.3%
Tricentis Tosca9.8%
OpenText Functional Testing7.2%
Other80.7%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Luis Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba
Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think, wow, we can do a lot of stuff, save a lot of time, and save a lot of money."
"Thus it saves a lot of my time and if I am using any third-party services, then it saves me money as well."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it provides configuration settings to make connections to the DB and web services, and because it has pre-written code exposed through a UI, it makes it much easier to configure tests."
"There is a range of different kinds of simulations that we can create – capture/replay up to creation of real, elaborate simulations of the back end."
"I use VSI, VSM, and SOA testing."
"Its integration capabilities with other external tools and technologies - such as Selenium, JDBC, external JARs (which can be placed in /HotDeploy and used) - is quite impressive, as is its wide range of support for various protocols, such as FTP, FTPS, HTTP to TCP, etc."
"Their support is great."
"Unit testing or early life testing did not have to be stopped or delayed because those services were not available."
"It adds to the productivity of developers and QAs, so there is definitely a return."
"The tool’s scalability is very good."
"We can test as many APIs as we like, it's very reliable and very easy to understand, anyone can learn it very quickly."
"For us this has meant increased test coverage, better system security, less test execution time and above all a greater quality product."
"The solution has some good scanning features."
"We chose this tool because it's lightweight, simple and intuitive."
"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."
"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."
 

Cons

"HPE ALM integration could be better, especially for exporting, importing, and reusing test cases written in an older version of CA Service Virtualization."
"I would rate customer service from CA to be very low AFTER you have purchased the software."
"Stability issues do arise if there is not enough system memory."
"Competitors have more user friendly user interfaces and some have front end systems which are easy to toggle and manipulate."
"Cross-browser support is not that good for that portal."
"I would like to see improvements in the naming conventions. The current naming conventions of CA Service Virtualization are hard to use."
"The one main thing we want to see is more on the reporting side."
"Licensing definitely needs more flexible models. Too many complicated parameters also makes it difficult for us to explain them to our customers."
"There are a lot of bugs and it can sometimes be 'quirky."
"In the LoadUI companion the scripts are not user friendly, and it also has a slow startup time."
"Working with Git needs to be improved. SoapUI 1.8.0 has this annoying habit of touching or changing many files that are unrelated to a test developer's actual change."
"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."
"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy."
"Sometimes you have to reload the project when you are moving/reorganizing tests in a project."
"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."
"The current interface is unsatisfactory."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."
"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
"The cost is not that bad."
"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"It is free of charge."
"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."
"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
899,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Construction Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise20
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
SoapUI NG Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: May 2026.
899,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.