Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence vs IBM Workload Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CA 7 Workload Automation In...
Ranking in Workload Automation
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Workload Automation
Ranking in Workload Automation
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence is 2.0%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Workload Automation is 8.4%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence?
Share your opinion
Ilhami Arikan - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2023
With an easy setup phase in place, agent-based installation can be done in minutes
Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the solution need improvement. These days, we need more visibility. We need to access the logs and databases easily. You need to keep track of the running number of logs, like which ones are executed, completed, etc. So if there would be a good reporting dashboard, then it would be good. There's room for improvement in the solution since it is a challenging thing when we want to use the solution's technology with our new technologies. For example, if we need to use TWS on our OpenShift platform, the solution's API is not capable enough. So the product itself needs to be aligned with new technologies.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."
"To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."
"It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."
"The solution is a little bit expensive."
"The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."
"The solution's pricing is affordable."
"We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
40%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Retailer
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with IBM Workload Automation?
IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach. For example, IBM still refers to machines as 'workstations,' whereas other systems, like Control-M, use m...
 

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation CA 7
IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hanwha, Sandvik, Vodafone Turkey, Sky
Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.