CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs IBM InfoSphere Optim comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Broadcom is ranked #19 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in DDM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA Database Management for ...

Read 13 CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS reviews

157 Views
53 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Read 3 IBM InfoSphere Optim reviews

582 Views
240 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CA Database Management for ...

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM InfoSphere Optim and CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS are competing in the database management efficiency category on IBM zOS platforms. CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set that justifies its cost.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Optim provides robust data privacy solutions, seamless data archiving, and strong support mechanisms. CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS offers extensive database performance management, adaptable resource optimization, and intricate performance tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS provides a flexible deployment approach with strong emphasis on integration simplicity, supported by reliable customer service. IBM InfoSphere Optim allows for straightforward deployment but receives feedback for slower customer response times.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere Optim is highlighted for competitive pricing and favorable ROI, aligning with cost-conscious environments. CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS commands a higher initial setup cost, offset by the long-term value its comprehensive features provide, reflecting a trade-off between upfront affordability and substantial feature investment.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,335 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Database Management for ...

Ranking in Database Development and Management

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Ranking in Database Development and Management

16th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

JOY GHARAMI

Technical Project Manager at Interra Information Technologies, Inc.

Report generation offers invaluable insights into database performance

I basically use the solution for database management and to view the performance of a particular database object, any specific program, batch program, or online programs. Using the CSSZ tool, I can effectively monitor performance. In case of an exception, I can inform the application team. At DB2…

Read full review

Ajai Lal

Project Manager at Mphasis

Very supportive of Db2 and easy to customize, but IMS features are not user friendly and the support of these features is lacking

We work on two different types of databases, one being IMS and the other Db2. While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases. When we had questions for the support team conerning the IMS database, we found their knowledge to be lacking, likely owing to lack of experience on their part. I would not say that the initial setup is complex. Neither would I say that it is straightforward. Certain features require technical knowledge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reports generated and the old statistics shown are really helpful."

"It takes advantage of new features of DB2."

"It is very stable. We have had no issues."

"It helps us to reduce hardware costs and to optimize processing times."

"Improved monitoring and performance management."

"The most important features are batch reporting and the ability to create repositories, enabling automated analysis. These are valuable because they enable me to do automated analysis of trends over time and reduce the time for comparing performance between two periods to identify anomalies."

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."

"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

Cons

"All the information we need, we could use to have it in a more usable format."

"They need to provide a way to create and maintain performance repositories. The online tool is not perfect, but it is giving me what I need."

"In the case of any particular SQL which is executing for a longer time and causing issues with any particular store or DB2 programs, if it could pinpoint the problems like any other tool should do, that would be really helpful."

"Minor stability issues."

"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS?

In the case of any particular SQL which is executing for a longer time and causing issues with any particular store or DB2 programs, if it could pinpoint the problems like any other tool should do,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS?

The solution operates on JetOS platform. It is a very good, perfect solution. I would rate it ten out of ten. Currently, I do not have any planning for investment at all.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

No data available

Informatica Data Archive vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 57% of the time

Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 43% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2025

CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS report

Download CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2025

Download IBM InfoSphere Optim product report

Also Known As

CA Database Management Solutions for DB2 for z/OS

IBM Optim, Optim

Overview

Database Management for DB2 for z/OS solutions from CA Technologies provide a set of tools designed to ensure optimal database and SQL performance, efficient administration, and reliable backup and recovery of DB2 databases, systems and apps.

Broadcom

IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.

IBM

Sample Customers

Blue Hill Data Services

Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB

Buyer's Guide

CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim

April 2025

Free Report: CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs. IBM InfoSphere Optim report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.