CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Zabbix comparison

Broadcom and Zabbix are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #102, while Zabbix is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zabbix’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

181 Views
135 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 105 Zabbix reviews

17,122 Views
13,019 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Zabbix compete in network monitoring. Zabbix seems to have the upper hand with its robust feature set and adaptability to varied IT environments.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor delivers advanced analytics, real-time call monitoring, and improved communication oversight. Zabbix provides extensive network monitoring, customizable metrics, and multi-environment support, offering wide-ranging utility.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its multi-platform integration, expand analytics features, and reduce deployment time. Zabbix might benefit from simplifying its setup process, increasing customer support options, and enhancing its reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is recognized for simple deployment and quick support, ensuring smooth integration. Zabbix presents a complicated deployment but offers robust community support and comprehensive documentation, emphasizing flexibility and available resources.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires a higher upfront investment but offers transparent pricing, which can lead to good ROI for communication monitoring. Zabbix provides a cost-effective option with lower initial costs, promising strong ROI due to its low ongoing expenses and extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

102nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

105

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Server Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 13.0%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

ASM Naushad Alam

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes

We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."

"Health and communication links availability."

"The product is very stable."

"The pricing of the product is reasonable."

"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."

"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."

"Zabbix is quite stable once it is set up. We haven't had any post-setup issues."

"It is a great product. The SNMP protocol tracking feature is good. I really like how it tracks SNMP. The alerts are also great."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."

"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."

"The documentation gets a bit messy between versions and is not too detailed, which is a bit painful for first-timers, especially when they run into issues."

"As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay."

"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."

"The networking monitor is not too easy to work with."

"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."

"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"The solution is free. However, many open-sourced tools start out free but eventually start charging."

"I use the tool's free version."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."

"It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

The cost is minimal. It is literally free.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

For me, Zabbix is very straightforward. I cannot think of any improvements needed. It's a very mature product. The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

NetXMS vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

March 2025

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

April 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.