Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs SUSE NeuVector comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and SUSE are both solutions in the Container Security category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while SUSE is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.6% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SUSE’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SUSE users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and SUSE NeuVector compete in the cloud-native application protection category. SUSE NeuVector has the upper hand due to its robust features and specialized runtime security capabilities.

Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is praised for its comprehensive threat detection, integration with public cloud platforms, and effective policy management. SUSE NeuVector receives positive feedback for its runtime security features, network visibility, and Kubernetes workload protection.

Room for Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP users suggest enhanced policy management, better visibility tools, and improved dashboard functionality. SUSE NeuVector users recommend improvements in scalability, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is appreciated for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support. SUSE NeuVector users report mixed experiences with deployment but benefit from detailed documentation and a responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers competitive setup costs, and users report a positive ROI. SUSE NeuVector users acknowledge higher initial costs but justify it with significant long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 4.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE NeuVector is 1.8%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security	4.6%
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP	2.6%
SUSE NeuVector	1.8%
Other	91.0%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Sreeraj Mohandas

Security Engineer at HashXpert

Consolidated cloud security has reduced manual work and has automated vulnerability remediation

I elaborate on my rating of SentinelOne support by mentioning that there was some time where the troubleshooting took a longer time. In fact, there were many meetings going on. The availability of the document on the internet is on a lesser side because as an engineer, I would want to know about the troubleshooting aspects of this particular tool. When I am facing a customer, I do not prefer to bring the vendor to every call and try to resolve it, as it takes months and months. It would be better to have a training session with the engineer on site to explain and train properly. This is not the case with SentinelOne, so this is the only thing I have a complaint about. I do not have any other room for improvement to suggest within SentinelOne itself. However, I would really want the AI assistant for the threat hunting part to be more accessible. They have it, but they are making it licensed, so it is a bit on the higher end.

Read full review

reviewer2751468

Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Boosts security and compliance in multi-cloud environments while real-time threat detection enhances risk management

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP flagged a misconfiguration in our AWS S3 bucket that had overly permissive access settings. That configuration could have exposed our sensitive data to the public internet. The platform not only identified the issue but also provided remediation that our team was able to apply immediately. This prevented a potential data exposure. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a unified, modular platform that combines CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, code security, and cloud detection and response. The agentless workload posture, real-time threat detection and response, multi-cloud coverage and visibility, compliance automation, and one-click remediations stand out as its best features. I find myself relying on the risk management engine and prioritization the most day-to-day. In any cloud environment, you are flooded with findings, misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and compliance gaps. Without prioritization, it is overwhelming for our team to take care of the posture. CloudGuard's risk scoring helps us cut through incidents. This makes remediation faster and focused instead of wasting time checking every alert. We get to fix the issues that pose real business risks. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has positively impacted our organization at a significant level. We get greater visibility and control across all our cloud environments. Some biggest benefits we have seen are faster detection and remediation of misconfigurations, improved compliance posture, reduced risk exposure, operational efficiency, and cost savings. Overall, it has made our cloud environment more secure, compliant, and easier to manage while freeing up our teams to focus on projects instead of chasing alerts.

Read full review

Danie Joubert

Managing Director at ProQuanta

Performs well, multiple deployment methods, and helpful support

The scalability of the solution is highly commendable, making it a compelling reason to consider incorporating new features. Its ability to scale efficiently, coupled with its multitude of clusters, reinforces the need for exploring additional functionalities. Most of our clients are enterprise-level. I rate the scalability of SUSE NeuVector a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The remediation process is good."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."

"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."

"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."

"The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."

"I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security a ten out of ten."

"The key strength of Singularity Cloud Security lies in its ability to pinpoint vulnerabilities in our cloud accounts and identify suspicious activity that warrants further investigation."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides email alerts and ranks issues based on severity, such as high, critical, etc., that help us prioritize issues."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"Using CloudGuard, I was able to manage a multi-cloud platform based on AWS, Azure, and Google for a multinational company in Europe with only three engineers."

"The posture management and remediation features are the most valuable. We use GSL Builder to build custom rules in alignment with our organization's policies. CloudGuard has canned rules using multiple standard frameworks, but we also have additional rules."

"Now, to see in a single pane of glass, all the agents, all the rules, everything that is going on in our datacenters, is quite valuable."

"It provides complete visibility of workload hosted on different cloud platforms including AWS and Azure, along with multiple tenants."

"Our primary use case of this solution is for compliance on the cloud and Check Point is very good for tracking that."

"The most valuable features of CloudGuard CNAPP are its compliance engine and auto-remediation features."

"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."

"This product provides a really nice visualization of the infrastructure, including network topology, firewalls, etc."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pros

"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."

"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."

"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."

"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."

"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."

"The UI has a lot of features."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."

More SUSE NeuVector pros

Cons

"A vulnerability alert would appear, and we'd fix it, but then the same alert would return the next day."

"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."

"There is scope for more application security posture management features. Additionally, the runtime protection needs attention."

"In addition to the console alerts, I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to also send email notifications."

"The application module focuses on the different codes and libraries that can be run on the machines. It is very important for Singularity EDR to detect what type of codes and what type of libraries can run in the machine. If they can implement a white list or a black list of codes or libraries that can be used in the machine, it would be very helpful. They can focus more on the application module."

"The SentinelOne customer support needs improvement, as they are sometimes late in responding, which is critical in a production issue."

"In version 2, a lot of rules have been deployed for Kubernetes security and CDR, which makes a lot of issues of critical severity, whereas they are not critical or of high severity. There is a mismatch of severities."

"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."

"Especially with cloud security, there's too much clutter on the screen and too many things going on."

"I would like CloudGuard's pricing to be cheaper, but I think that's impossible. The pricing is the only thing I think they can improve."

"You do need to pay extra in order to get better support."

"We want to be able to customize the solution more in order to meet the needs of our company."

"Scalability, particularly in workload protection, is an area that needs improvement."

"The guidelines to implement or to link with the clouds are not complete."

"The costs are high."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP cons

"The documentation needs to improve a bit."

"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."

"Using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features between two clusters and could be improved."

"The image-scanning features need improvement."

"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."

"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."

"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."

"However, I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues."

More SUSE NeuVector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is costly."

"SentinelOne offers excellent pricing and licensing options."

"The pricing for PingSafe in India was more reasonable than other competitors."

"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."

"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."

"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."

"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."

"I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is moderate. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive."

"The pricing is tremendous and super cheap. It is shockingly cheap for what you get out of it. I am happy with that. I hope that doesn't get reported back and they increase the prices. I love the pricing and the licensing makes sense. It is just assets: The more stuff that you have, the more you pay."

"The pricing is extremely competitive."

"It is difficult to contextualize the pricing because we are used to Indian pricing and licensing."

"They support either annual licensing or hourly. At the time of our last negotiation, it was either one or the other, you could not mix or match. I would have liked to mix/match. "

"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is always known as a good solution but an expensive one. When you're using Cisco, Check Point, or Palo Alto, you know that you will pay more, but you know that it will work."

"The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pricing and cost advice

"The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."

"SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	52
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	59

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	58

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is that the pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

Integration could be improved because not all solutions can be integrated with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard Workload Protection?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been reasonable for the value it delivers. The initial setu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

One area that Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP could use improvement is the navigation when switching between modules. A ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

My main use case for Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is strengthening cloud security posture, monitoring configurations,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NeuVector?

One area for improvement is NeuVector's ability to import CVEs from different sources. Additionally, using a node por...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NeuVector?

In my company, I am looking to deploy a container security runtime solution.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NeuVector?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 17% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 2% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Competitors

Trivy vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 10% of the time

Sysdig Falco vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 9% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 5% of the time

More SUSE NeuVector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

April 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

May 2026

Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

May 2026

Download SUSE NeuVector product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence

NeuVector

Overview

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.

Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.

What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive operation simplifies navigation across platforms.
Real-Time Detection: Quick identification and response to threats.
Automated Remediation: Streamlines recovery processes with integration capabilities.
Forensic Visibility: Aids in thorough threat analysis and prevention strategies.
Comprehensive Console: Offers full visibility and historical data tracking.
Platform Integration: Supports seamless operation across cloud and hybrid environments.

What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and third-party integration improve threat response.
Improved Detection: Reduces mean time to detect and respond to threats.
Operational Support: Comprehensive visibility and forensic tools aid operational decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Affordable integration with scaling capabilities without high overhead.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.

SentinelOne

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Dynamic Access Control: Enables granular security permissions for cloud resources.
Asset Protection: Safeguards cloud assets from unauthorized access and threats.
Compliance Checks: Ensures alignment with industry regulations like PCI DSS and SOC 2.
Centralized Firewall Management: Simplifies firewall rule configuration across cloud environments.
IAM Scanning: Audits and secures identity and access management configurations.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides insights into cloud environments for proactive threat detection.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Threat Intelligence: Identifies and mitigates potential risks before exploitation.
Auto-Remediation: Automates responses to security incidents, reducing manual intervention.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies management and enhances operational efficiency.
Posture Management: Maintains strong security posture through continuous assessment.

Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.

Check Point Software Technologies

SUSE NeuVector offers robust container security with features like image scanning, anti-malware, deployment simplicity, and run-time security. It enhances risk management and performance across container, client, node, network security, and vulnerability scanning.

SUSE NeuVector is designed for comprehensive Kubernetes and container security, handling vulnerability management, and simplifying deployment in hybrid environments. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports multiple clusters, providing flexibility for cloud and on-premise implementations. The platform enhances compliance with automation and informative interfaces, aiding in ISO certification checks. While it excels in various security aspects, there are areas for improvement including image scanning and integration with other tools. Users need enhanced visibility into DevSecOps and better support for IaaS VMs, alongside improved documentation and monitoring capabilities.

What are the key features of SUSE NeuVector?

Image Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in container images to ensure policy satisfaction.
Run-time Security: Protects container workloads with network behavior automation.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates into existing pipelines like GitLab.
Multi-Cluster Support: Manages security across clusters efficiently.
Advanced Learning Automation: Enhances security with intelligent automation and machine learning.

What benefits can users expect from SUSE NeuVector?

Risk Management: Enhances security for container environments, mitigating potential threats.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers economical solutions for robust container security.
Performance Improvement: Boosts security efficiency with streamlined processes.
Compliance Enhancement: Supports ISO checks and policy compliance, ensuring standards are met.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud and on-premise setups, providing varied deployment options.

Industries implement SUSE NeuVector to fortify container security within Kubernetes ecosystems. Often used in conjunction with Amazon AWS, it monitors events and manages vulnerabilities to protect assets. It finds application in sectors where security runtime solutions and network automation are crucial, catering to both cloud-based and on-premise needs. Its integration capabilities with CI/CD pipelines support agile software development across different industries.

SUSE

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners

Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector

April 2026

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.