Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center comparison

Checkmarx and OpenText are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5. Checkmarx holds a 12.1% mindshare in SAST, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

24,101 Views
15,776 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 4 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

426 Views
337 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Fortify Software Security C...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Checkmarx One are two prominent solutions competing in application security. Checkmarx One appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and ease of use.

Features: Fortify offers comprehensive vulnerability coverage, numerous integration options, and strong support. Checkmarx One is known for its intuitive functionality, robust scanning capabilities, and support for multiple programming languages.

Room for Improvement: Fortify users point out the need for improved reporting, faster scanning speeds, and enhanced analytics. Checkmarx One could benefit from better scan accuracy, a more user-friendly installation, and further optimization of its accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify's deployment is stable but has a steep learning curve. Customer service is proactive yet needs faster response times. Checkmarx One offers a smoother deployment and consistent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify has a manageable initial setup cost, though its ROI is questioned due to optimization time. Checkmarx One is more expensive but justifies its ROI with streamlined processes and faster integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.1%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Kibeom Kim

General Manager at Inexion Co.

Has a good collaboration function and is a centralized software solution

We use the product to scan results, store and display data from Azure, identify scan results, analyze, report, and access company data The platform's most effective for identifying vulnerabilities features are the Fortify audit workbench and the collaboration module, which allow developers and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important."

"The tool's valuable features include integrating GPT and Copilot. Additionally, the UI web representation is very user-friendly, making navigation easy. GPT has made several improvements to my security code."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"The UI is user-friendly."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

More Checkmarx One pros

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

Cons

"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."

"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"Meta data is always needed."

More Checkmarx One cons

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"The solution is priced fair."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?

You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available. I would rate the pricing a seven.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 47% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 58% of the time

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 27% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

December 2024

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

Learn More

Checkmarx

OpenText

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.