Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center comparison

Checkmarx and OpenText are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while OpenText is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5. Checkmarx holds a 12.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Checkmarx One
Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 26,318 Views
  • 17,016 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Fortify Software Security C...
Read 4 Fortify Software Security Center reviews
  • 421 Views
  • 336 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Checkmarx One are two prominent solutions competing in application security. Checkmarx One appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and ease of use.

Features: Fortify offers comprehensive vulnerability coverage, numerous integration options, and strong support. Checkmarx One is known for its intuitive functionality, robust scanning capabilities, and support for multiple programming languages.

Room for Improvement: Fortify users point out the need for improved reporting, faster scanning speeds, and enhanced analytics. Checkmarx One could benefit from better scan accuracy, a more user-friendly installation, and further optimization of its accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify's deployment is stable but has a steep learning curve. Customer service is proactive yet needs faster response times. Checkmarx One offers a smoother deployment and consistent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify has a manageable initial setup cost, though its ROI is questioned due to optimization time. Checkmarx One is more expensive but justifies its ROI with streamlined processes and faster integration.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Checkmarx One's support is generally rated positively for knowledgeability and quick responses, despite occasional delays and unresolved issues.
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software's support is criticized for being slow and unclear, causing users to prefer direct email for assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Checkmarx One needs better accuracy, language support, integration, flexibility, UI customization, documentation, dynamic testing, and API security features.
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software Security Center is challenging to implement, with poor documentation, limited support, integration issues, and a complex interface.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Checkmarx One is favored for its scalability and efficiency, though licensing and resource challenges are sometimes noted.
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software Security Center is scalable but challenging, efficiently serving limited users primarily within security teams.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.4
Checkmarx One is costly but valued for its robust security, despite complexity in setup and licensing options.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Checkmarx One is stable for most, but large codebase handling can cause crashes, memory issues, and configuration dependence.
Sentiment score
7.0
Users find Fortify Software Security Center stable and reliable, despite implementation challenges, with a high confidence rating.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Checkmarx One enhances secure coding with user-friendly interface, automation, and multi-language support, making it ideal for developers.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Fortify Software Security C...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.8%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Kibeom Kim - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a good collaboration function and is a centralized software solution
We use the product to scan results, store and display data from Azure, identify scan results, analyze, report, and access company data The platform's most effective for identifying vulnerabilities features are the Fortify audit workbench and the collaboration module, which allow developers and…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?
You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available. I would rate the pricing a seven.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One
Compared 49% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 13% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One
Compared 6% of the time
Coverity vs Checkmarx One Logo
Coverity vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
Snyk vs Checkmarx One Logo
Snyk vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 63% of the time
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 20% of the time
More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
November 2024
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
October 2024
Fortify Software Security Center reportDownload Fortify Software Security Center product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
 

Learn More

Checkmarx
OpenText
 

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center
October 2024
Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.