Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortify Software Security Center Logo

Top 10 Fortify Software Security Center Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
849 followers
Post review

Top Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortify Software Security Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Checkmarx One, Tricentis Tosca, and OWASP Zap. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center excels in vulnerability detection and coding standards, offering straightforward deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Checkmarx One's extensive language support and advanced integration capabilities deliver greater versatility and value despite higher initial setup costs.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report
Fortify Software Security Center incurs high setup costs, making it less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Checkmarx One offers a more affordable setup, attracting those looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify Software Security Center incurs high setup costs, making it less appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas Checkmarx One offers a more affordable setup, attracting those looking for cost-effective solutions.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca is used for test automation, UI-based regression tests, functional testing, and regression. Widely utilized for SAP, web, mobile, APIs, mainframes, Salesforce, and Windows applications. Scriptless automation, model-based testing, and robust integration. Supports technical and non-technical users with fast setup, intuitive UI, automated regression testing, and customizable libraries.

​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
View comparison
Pricing
​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center is appreciated for integration capabilities and enterprise readiness. In comparison, OWASP Zap offers comprehensive features and robust scanning, appealing to a wider audience. Fortify provides structured support, while OWASP Zap is straightforward with strong community backing and affordability.
Download Fortify Software Security Center vs. OWASP Zap Report
Fortify Software Security Center often incurs higher setup costs compared to OWASP Zap, which generally offers a more cost-effective initial setup, reflecting their differing target markets and the complexity of their respective features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify Software Security Center often incurs higher setup costs compared to OWASP Zap, which generally offers a more cost-effective initial setup, reflecting their differing target markets and the complexity of their respective features.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix
3.8 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix
3.8 out of 5
Acunetix is cost-effective and integrates efficiently with third-party tools for quick assessments. In comparison, Fortify Software Security Center is chosen for its extensive testing capabilities, despite higher costs, meeting the needs of large enterprises requiring in-depth security analysis.
Download Acunetix vs. Fortify Software Security Center Report
Acunetix offers straightforward setup costs, making it attractive for users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Fortify Software Security Center requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Acunetix offers straightforward setup costs, making it attractive for users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions, while Fortify Software Security Center requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities.
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
Fortify Software Security Center Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan attracts tech buyers with strong vulnerability detection and cost-effective features. In comparison, Fortify Software Security Center, while requiring higher investment, appeals with its extensive analysis and comprehensive capabilities, offering long-term value. Each solution addresses different priorities in application security needs.
Download Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan offers minimal setup costs, enhancing quick deployment, while Fortify Software Security Center requires more substantial initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers minimal setup costs, enhancing quick deployment, while Fortify Software Security Center requires more substantial initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive security features.

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Application Security Tools
Vulnerability Management