Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan comparison

Checkmarx and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while HCLSoftware is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.9. Checkmarx holds a 12.1% mindshare in AS, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

24,681 Views
16,235 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

4,123 Views
3,144 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Checkmarx One compete in the application security category. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities and integration flexibility, making it a favored choice for comprehensive security.

Features: HCL AppScan is known for thorough scanning capabilities, comprehensive vulnerability management, and effective pricing. Checkmarx One is valued for precise results, seamless integration with development tools, and insight-rich security analysis.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users call for enhancements in scan speed, customization options, and interface design. Checkmarx One users highlight the need for improved setup documentation, more intuitive configuration processes, and additional training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan benefits from straightforward deployments but would gain from more robust customer service. Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment options and supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan provides affordable options with a promising return on investment. Checkmarx One, despite being more expensive, is seen as justified by users due to its extensive features and long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.1%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

AnshulTomar

Cyber Security Architect and Presales Consultant at Kyndryl

Scalable platform with efficient static and dynamic testing features

We use the product for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). By integrating AppScan into our CI/CD pipelines, aligned with Agile methodologies, we ensure that security testing becomes an integral part of the software development lifecycle The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."

"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."

"The ability to track the vulnerabilities inside the code (origin and destination of weak variables or functions)."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It was easy to set up."

"The solution is cheap."

"The solution is easy to install. I would rate the product's setup between six to seven out of ten. The deployment time depends on the applications that need to be scanned. We have a development and operations team to take care of the product's maintenance."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"The product is useful, particularly in its sensitivity and scanning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language."

"This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."

"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

More Checkmarx One cons

"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."

"It has crashed at times."

"The pricing has room for improvement."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"They have to improve support."

"AppScan is too complicated and should be made more user-friendly."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"It's relatively expensive."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"The solution is costly."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The solution is cheap."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"The price is very expensive."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 47% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Acunetix vs Checkmarx One

Compared 1% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

January 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Learn More

Checkmarx

HCLSoftware

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.