Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan comparison

Checkmarx and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while HCLSoftware is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.9. Checkmarx holds a 10.7% mindshare in AS, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

21,297 Views
14,284 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

3,792 Views
2,867 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Checkmarx One compete in the application security category. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities and integration flexibility, making it a favored choice for comprehensive security.

Features: HCL AppScan is known for thorough scanning capabilities, comprehensive vulnerability management, and effective pricing. Checkmarx One is valued for precise results, seamless integration with development tools, and insight-rich security analysis.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users call for enhancements in scan speed, customization options, and interface design. Checkmarx One users highlight the need for improved setup documentation, more intuitive configuration processes, and additional training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan benefits from straightforward deployments but would gain from more robust customer service. Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment options and supportive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan provides affordable options with a promising return on investment. Checkmarx One, despite being more expensive, is seen as justified by users due to its extensive features and long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.7%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Rishi Anupam

Senior Manager at Airtel

A stable and scalable scanning solution with good reporting feature

The solution is used for the vulnerabilities scan on the network side The reporting part is the most valuable feature. The penetration testing feature should be included. I have been using the solution for four years. It is a stable solution. I rate it seven out of ten. It is a scalable…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results."

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

More Checkmarx One pros

"You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"AppScan is stable."

"It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end."

"I like the recording feature."

"The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing."

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient."

"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."

"It is an expensive solution."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

More Checkmarx One cons

"AppScan is too complicated and should be made more user-friendly."

"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."

"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."

"Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features."

"Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products."

"A desktop version should be added."

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Acunetix vs Checkmarx One

Compared 1% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 10% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

March 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

March 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.