Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HCL AppScan Logo

Top 10 HCL AppScan Alternatives

Vendor: HCLSoftware
3.9 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
1,789 followers
Post review

Top HCL AppScan Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HCL AppScan based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Veracode, and GitLab. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

HCLSoftware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with HCLSoftware , and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
HCL AppScan is favored for its pricing and responsive customer service, offering robust security testing features. In comparison, SonarQube Server stands out with its comprehensive code analysis capabilities, making it suitable for teams focusing on long-term code quality despite a higher initial setup cost.
Download HCL AppScan vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
HCL AppScan requires significant upfront investment for setup, while SonarQube Server offers a more moderate setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires significant upfront investment for setup, while SonarQube Server offers a more moderate setup cost, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.
HCL AppScan Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in test automation and security scanning with competitive pricing. In comparison, Veracode offers advanced static analysis and insights into vulnerabilities. HCL AppScan suits smaller setups due to lower costs, while Veracode appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive features despite higher initial expenses.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Veracode Report
HCL AppScan offers a more affordable setup cost, while Veracode has a higher setup cost but provides robust support.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers a more affordable setup cost, while Veracode has a higher setup cost but provides robust support.
HCL AppScan Logo
GitLab
4.3 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
GitLab
4.3 out of 5
HCL AppScan offers extensive security testing and vulnerability management, ideal for security-focused buyers. In comparison, GitLab provides flexible CI/CD and collaborative features, appealing to those seeking integrated development environments. HCL AppScan's cost aligns with security needs, while GitLab's pricing suits diverse organizational goals.
Download GitLab vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan requires a substantial initial setup cost, while GitLab typically offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires a substantial initial setup cost, while GitLab typically offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
HCL AppScan Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking thorough security solutions. In comparison, Snyk emphasizes developer integration and ease of deployment, suitable for teams prioritizing open-source security with quick setup and flexible pricing.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Snyk Report
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost, while Snyk offers a lower entry price, making it more affordable for startups and smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost, while Snyk offers a lower entry price, making it more affordable for startups and smaller enterprises.
HCL AppScan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
HCL AppScan impresses with cost-effectiveness, comprehensive scanning, and easy deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking seamless integration. In comparison, Checkmarx One attracts those valuing extensive code analysis and feature richness, despite higher costs, offering superior adaptability across various coding standards and languages.
Download Checkmarx One vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan has a lower setup cost compared to Checkmarx One, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. In contrast, Checkmarx One tends to have a higher setup cost, which might influence budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a lower setup cost compared to Checkmarx One, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. In contrast, Checkmarx One tends to have a higher setup cost, which might influence budget considerations.
HCL AppScan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Mend.io
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan is known for its thoroughness in detecting vulnerabilities and customizable scanning options, appealing to users seeking comprehensive security coverage. In comparison, Mend.io offers seamless integration and efficient automation, attracting tech buyers with its innovative features and competitive pricing.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Mend.io Report
HCL AppScan requires a substantial initial investment, while Mend.io offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires a substantial initial investment, while Mend.io offers a more cost-effective setup option.
HCL AppScan Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
HCL AppScan appeals to tech buyers with its affordability and integration ease, offering comprehensive scanning capabilities. In comparison, Fortify on Demand attracts those seeking extensive language support and scalability. Tech buyers prioritize pricing and support with HCL AppScan or advanced features with Fortify on Demand.
Download Fortify on Demand vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan setup costs are typically higher, focusing on comprehensive features, whereas Fortify on Demand often appeals with lower initial investment and cloud-based convenience.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan setup costs are typically higher, focusing on comprehensive features, whereas Fortify on Demand often appeals with lower initial investment and cloud-based convenience.
HCL AppScan Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan is valued for its affordability and robust customer support. In comparison, Sonatype Lifecycle offers comprehensive application analysis and an extensive library crucial for lifecycle management, albeit at a higher cost. Each solution uniquely addresses different security management needs.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Sonatype Lifecycle Report
HCL AppScan requires significant upfront costs, while Sonatype Lifecycle offers a lower setup cost. The noticeable cost difference is a key consideration between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires significant upfront costs, while Sonatype Lifecycle offers a lower setup cost. The noticeable cost difference is a key consideration between the two solutions.
HCL AppScan Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan is ideal for those seeking comprehensive platform scanning and robust integration features. In comparison, Acunetix offers advanced scanning features with broad language support. Both products cater to different needs, making them suitable for distinct vulnerability management requirements.
Download Acunetix vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost compared to Acunetix, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for businesses with cost constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost compared to Acunetix, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for businesses with cost constraints.
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
4.3 out of 5
HCL AppScan appeals to buyers for its automated scanning integration and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional attracts those seeking manual testing capabilities and flexibility, despite its higher price, providing valuable security insights for experienced teams.
Download HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report
HCL AppScan requires an upfront setup cost, offering comprehensive security features, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional charges for additional features, focusing on a flexible approach. Users need to consider pricing differences when selecting a solution.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires an upfront setup cost, offering comprehensive security features, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional charges for additional features, focusing on a flexible approach. Users need to consider pricing differences when selecting a solution.
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in pricing and offers customizable tests, making it flexible for various needs. In comparison, Qualys Web Application Scanning integrates well with other tools and provides detailed reports, justifying its higher cost. HCL AppScan is recommended for its cost-effectiveness, while Qualys is preferred for its integrations and reporting features.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning Report
HCL AppScan's setup cost is often praised for its simplicity and quick deployment. Qualys Web Application Scanning, on the other hand, has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan's setup cost is often praised for its simplicity and quick deployment. Qualys Web Application Scanning, on the other hand, has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive configuration options.
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
3.8 out of 5
HCL AppScan appeals with cost-effectiveness and detailed reporting, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious buyers seeking robust scanning. In comparison, Tenable.io's real-time monitoring and integration flexibility cater to those prioritizing comprehensive features despite its higher price.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report
HCL AppScan has a high setup cost, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers a simpler, cost-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a high setup cost, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers a simpler, cost-friendly setup.
HCL AppScan Logo
CodeSonar
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
CodeSonar
4.1 out of 5
HCL AppScan offers comprehensive threat detection and robust customer support, beneficial for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, CodeSonar provides deeper static code analysis, appealing for those needing superior security measures. HCL AppScan’s pricing and ease of deployment contrast with CodeSonar’s advanced code inspection features.
Download CodeSonar vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan has a higher setup cost compared to CodeSonar. However, CodeSonar offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to those seeking lower upfront investment options.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a higher setup cost compared to CodeSonar. However, CodeSonar offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing to those seeking lower upfront investment options.
HCL AppScan Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in comprehensive vulnerability detection with flexible deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Kiuwan offers efficient integration and affordability, making it ideal for diverse programming environments. HCL may suit organizations prioritizing support, while Kiuwan appeals with cost-effective integration capabilities.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Kiuwan Report
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan offers competitive setup costs suitable for large enterprises, while Kiuwan provides a more cost-effective setup ideal for smaller teams. Differing approaches to affordability highlight distinct target audiences and utilization scales.
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
Contrast Security Assess
4.4 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in automated testing, providing thorough vulnerability detection and catering to budget-conscious buyers with its attractive pricing. In comparison, Contrast Security Assess surpasses AppScan in real-time insights and integration, justifying its higher cost with advanced features and adaptability.
Download Contrast Security Assess vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a moderate setup cost, while Contrast Security Assess offers a more cost-effective setup option.
HCL AppScan Logo
HCL AppScan Logo
Contrast Security Protect
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan offers comprehensive scanning and integration for vulnerability assessments, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Contrast Security Protect focuses on real-time threat detection and seamless deployment, attracting those seeking efficient security with a quicker ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan Report
HCL AppScan requires a significant upfront setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This highlights a clear distinction in upfront investment between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan requires a significant upfront setup cost, while Contrast Security Protect offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This highlights a clear distinction in upfront investment between the two security solutions.
HCL AppScan Logo
Spirent CyberFlood
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan Logo
Spirent CyberFlood
4.2 out of 5
HCL AppScan excels in vulnerability scanning, offering efficient security flaw identification. In comparison, Spirent CyberFlood focuses on advanced performance testing and simulated cyber-attacks for network evaluation. HCL suits application security, while CyberFlood attracts those needing comprehensive network performance insights.
Download HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost than Spirent CyberFlood, making the latter more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost than Spirent CyberFlood, making the latter more budget-friendly.

Related categories

Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)