HCL AppScan vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

HCLSoftware and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. HCLSoftware holds a 2.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 42 HCL AppScan reviews

4,509 Views
3,469 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

164 Views
104 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Spirent CyberFlood are robust tools in the cybersecurity domain. User reviews highlight Spirent CyberFlood for its comprehensive features, suggesting it offers better value for its price.

Features: HCL AppScan is known for strong vulnerability detection capabilities, varied integration options, and effective security scanning. Spirent CyberFlood is valued for extensive testing and simulation features, advanced threat modeling, and its ability to enhance cyber resilience. Users find Spirent's feature set to be more comprehensive than AppScan's.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could benefit from a more intuitive setup, less complexity in its operations, and more responsive updates. Spirent CyberFlood users suggest enhancements in reporting, analytics, and the interface design. Spirent's areas of improvement are seen as less critical by users compared to those of AppScan.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is noted for easier deployment processes but faces criticism for slow customer service responsiveness. Spirent CyberFlood, while more complex to set up, is praised for proactive customer support, with users feeling that Spirent’s comprehensive guidance offsets its deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is seen as more cost-effective, with users finding its financial accessibility an advantage. Spirent CyberFlood, though it has a higher upfront cost, delivers a strong ROI through superior features and robust support, making it worth the investment for many despite the higher initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

13th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gladwin Christian

QA manager at SmartStream Technologies ltd.

Sep 29, 2023

A useful tool to scan applications that can be easily installed

Given that we have been using HCL AppScan for many years, I think the setup process is not difficult at all. Sometimes, some issues stop or prevent my company from moving forward with the product's setup phase. We have to call HCL's support team and engage in long discussions to smoothly carry out the setup phase. In general, the product's setup phase is not difficult in our company. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The licenses for the solution are available only on cloud deployments nowadays. The solution is already installed in our environment. Every time a new release or software comes out from HCL, our company does a scan, which takes maybe a day or two.

Read full review

Haider Jarral

Lead Technologist | Strategic Alliance | Business Development at Illumio

May 4, 2023

I like the solution's flexibility

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing CyberFlood is flexible. Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting part is the most valuable feature."

"This is a stable solution."

"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."

"There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base."

"The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features."

"For me, as a manager, it was the ease of use. Inserting security into the development process is not normally an easy project to do. The ability for the developer to actually use it and get results and focuses, that's what counted."

"The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well."

"We leverage it as a quality check against code."

More HCL AppScan pros

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

Cons

"There is not a central management for static and dynamic."

"HCL AppScan needs to improve security."

"I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources."

"If HCL AppScan is able to alert the clients over email once the scan is complete, it would be great. Right now, HCL AppScan doesn't let me know if the scanning part is finished or not, because of which I have to come back and check mostly."

"The dashboard, for AppScan or the Fortified fast tool, which we use needs to be improved."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"A desktop version should be added."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

We use AppScan primarily for security testing and performance monitoring across our systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 9% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 70% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 30% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

October 2024

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Learn More

HCLSoftware

Spirent

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.