HCL AppScan vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] comparison

HCLSoftware and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Additionally, 84% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

4,542 Views
3,179 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 22, 2025

HCL AppScan and Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] compete in the cybersecurity space, with AppScan excelling in application security testing and CyberFlood [EOL] focusing on network threat assessment. HCL AppScan appears to have an edge due to its comprehensive security features.

Features: HCL AppScan offers vulnerability detection across the software lifecycle, supports multiple programming languages, and integrates with CI/CD tools. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] provides advanced threat environment simulations, network resilience evaluation, and flexibility in network performance testing.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could enhance its scalability and multi-language support for broader adaptability. More intuitive UI improvements and quicker update rollouts may also benefit users. For Spirent CyberFlood [EOL], increased compatibility with more configurations, better reporting features, and enhanced UI would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers flexible deployment options, either on-premises or in the cloud, coupled with a highly responsive support system. Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] also adapts easily in various environments, though feedback suggests HCL AppScan's customer service is more effective and timely.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is known for competitive pricing and offers a high ROI due to low setup costs and wide-ranging security capabilities. Although Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] might incur higher initial expenses, it provides significant returns for businesses focused on extensive network testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,260 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (20th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (17th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting part is the most valuable feature."

"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production."

"It was easy to set up."

"This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

"It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is scanning QR codes."

"We are now deploying less defects to production."

More HCL AppScan pros

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"They could add a software component analysis tool."

"I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers."

"They should have a better UI for dashboards."

"Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products."

"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."

"I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point."

"Sometimes it doesn't work so well."

"The product has some technical limitations."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is moderately priced."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"The tool was expensive."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The price is very expensive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 9% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Sqreen vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Acunetix vs Spirent CyberFlood [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

February 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] effectively minimizes network monitoring tasks with its impressive traffic generator and call flow function. Known for its user-friendliness, it supports network security testing and compliance across public and private clouds for large enterprises.

Users find Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] beneficial for comprehensive security evaluations, particularly in compliance and product testing. Its capabilities in generating SSL traffic assist in cybersecurity assessments, demonstrating flexibility and ease of use. The platform supports custom test assurance and automation, allowing financial and public sectors to enhance their cybersecurity measures. Despite its advantages, users desire improvements in ports, speed, multilingual support, browser accessibility, error reporting, and interface navigation.

What features does Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] offer?

Traffic Generator: Minimizes network monitoring tasks effectively.
Call Flow Function: Simplifies network processes for better management.
User-Friendliness: Enhances scheduling and usage efficiency.
Compliance Testing: Aids in product and compliance examinations.
Unauthorized File Transfer Monitoring: Ensures superior compliance performance.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Flexibility: Supports diverse network security testing scenarios.
Performance: Delivers reliable compliance enforcement capabilities.
Comprehensive Testing: Addresses small to large enterprise security needs.
Enhanced Automation: Benefits public and financial sectors for test assurance.

Spirent CyberFlood [EOL] is instrumental in enterprise environments within public and private sectors, offering robust network security testing and automation support. Large enterprises in financial industries utilize it to ensure cybersecurity standards, especially in cloud environments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.