HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

HCLSoftware and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.9, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. HCLSoftware holds a 2.6% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

4,274 Views
3,278 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 62 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,731 Views
2,440 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional compete in application security testing. HCL AppScan appears to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional leads in feature comprehensiveness.

Features: HCL AppScan offers automated scanning capabilities, comprehensive security coverage, and efficiency appealing to enterprises. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional provides advanced manual testing features, customization options, and flexibility for identifying vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could benefit from a streamlined setup process, better integration capabilities, and improved user guidance. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could improve by offering more detailed documentation, a more intuitive navigation experience, and reduced complexity in features customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan receives positive feedback for straightforward deployment in complex environments and responsive customer service. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is noted for deployment flexibility but has a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is valued for being cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, particularly for large-scale operations. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, despite a higher initial cost, delivers high ROI through in-depth testing features that justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 817,354 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Gladwin Christian

QA manager at SmartStream Technologies ltd.

A useful tool to scan applications that can be easily installed

Given that we have been using HCL AppScan for many years, I think the setup process is not difficult at all. Sometimes, some issues stop or prevent my company from moving forward with the product's setup phase. We have to call HCL's support team and engage in long discussions to smoothly carry out the setup phase. In general, the product's setup phase is not difficult in our company. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The licenses for the solution are available only on cloud deployments nowadays. The solution is already installed in our environment. Every time a new release or software comes out from HCL, our company does a scan, which takes maybe a day or two.

Read full review

Anton Krivonosov

Application Security Architect at Kuehne & Nagel Inc.

A special tool for penetration testers or security specialists to conduct security assessments

We use the solution for security assessments. It's a special tool for penetration testers or security specialists PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a standard tool in the security industry. It's a stable solution that has many features. You can download different plugins if you don't have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"This is a stable solution."

"You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

"The solution is easy to use."

More HCL AppScan pros

"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."

"There is no other tool like it. I like the intuitiveness and the plugins that are available."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."

"For pentesting scenarios, this is the number one tool. It can capture the request, and there are so many functions that are very good for that. For example, a black box satellite host."

"The solution has a pretty simple setup."

"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."

"We use the solution for vulnerability assessment in respect of the application and the sites."

"Enables automation of different tasks such as authorization testing."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good."

"Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features."

"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"Improvement can be done as per customer requirements."

"They have to improve support."

More HCL AppScan cons

"One thing that is not up to the mark in PortSwigger is web application testing. I found some issues with its performance and reporting. They should work on these and give us a better outcome."

"There were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it."

"There needs to be better documentation provided. Currently, we need to buy books, or we need to review online some use cases from other professionals who have been using the solution to find out their experience. It is not easy to find out how to properly do a security assessment."

"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."

"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."

"The Initial setup is a bit complex."

"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."

"Improvement should be done as per the requirements of customers."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"The solution is cheap."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"The price is very expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"We have one license. The price is very nominal."

"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"There are different licenses available that include a free version."

"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

We use AppScan primarily for security testing and performance monitoring across our systems.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten. It's not as flexible here as it might be in European or American markets.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 9% of the time

OWASP Zap vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

November 2024

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

November 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Burp

Learn More

HCLSoftware

PortSwigger

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

December 2024

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

817,354 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.