Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Invicti and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. Invicti holds a 2.6% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 31 Acunetix reviews

3,627 Views
2,917 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 62 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,592 Views
2,373 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Acunetix

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional compete in the web vulnerability scanner category. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is favored for its advanced functionalities, despite its higher cost.

Features: Acunetix provides automation in vulnerability scanning, aiding efficiency in continuous integration environments. It is known for its detailed reporting and user-friendly interface. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is preferred for its comprehensive manual testing tools, facilitating detailed and granular analysis, which is ideal for security professionals seeking thorough investigations.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from enhanced reporting flexibility and a more intuitive issue management interface. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users suggest improving scalability for large environments and the support for automated workflows. Each product targets specific user needs in these areas.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is commended for its simple deployment process and effective customer support, providing a quick start and reliable troubleshooting. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, despite having a more complex setup, offers comprehensive documentation and a responsive support team capable of assisting with sophisticated deployment needs.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has a competitive pricing model offering solid ROI, particularly attractive for smaller organizations. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, although more expensive, is considered valuable due to its extensive capabilities, providing substantial returns in advanced security testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (21st), DevSecOps (6th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

More Acunetix pros

"For pentesting scenarios, this is the number one tool. It can capture the request, and there are so many functions that are very good for that. For example, a black box satellite host."

"The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications."

"The solution has a pretty simple setup."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional has an intercept tab that helps us to scan our APIs, set the response, and request errors."

"The Repeater and the BApp extensions are particularly useful. Certain extensions, such as the Active Scan extensions and the Autoracer extension, are very good."

"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."

"It is a time-saver application."

"The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

More Acunetix cons

"The pricing of the solution is quite high."

"The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired."

"The price could be better. The rest is fine."

"The technical support team's response time is mostly delayed and should be improved."

"There is not much automation in the tool."

"It would be good if the solution could give us more details about what exactly is defective."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"One thing that is not up to the mark in PortSwigger is web application testing. I found some issues with its performance and reporting. They should work on these and give us a better outcome."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is exceptionally high."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The solution used to be expensive. However, they have reduced the price to approximately $400.00 which is reasonable."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The pricing for Burp Suite Professional is not very high, however, it could be more flexible for clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

January 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

Burp

Learn More

Invicti

PortSwigger

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.