HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

HCL AppScan and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the security scanning category. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand in feature offerings, which makes it a preferred choice for many users, despite higher costs.

Features: HCL AppScan is appreciated for its extensive scanning capabilities, offering a variety of integration options that facilitate thorough vulnerability assessments. Tenable.io is favored for its comprehensive dashboards and ease of use during scanning tasks. Differences arise in real-time notifications and report generation efficiency, with Tenable.io appearing superior in these areas.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users frequently mention the need for more intuitive navigation and better documentation. Additionally, they highlight the necessity for enhanced user interface design. Tenable.io reviewers suggest improvements in scan speed and finer-tuned configuration options to suit diverse environments, alongside more detailed in-app guidance for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers a straightforward deployment model that is well-regarded by users, with strong customer service support. Tenable.io, while having an efficient deployment process, could improve customer service according to some reviews. Its robust cloud-based deployment model appeals to users seeking flexibility and scalability.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is often seen as offering better immediate value with reasonable setup costs, although its long-term ROI is mixed. Tenable.io, despite its higher price point, is perceived as offering substantial ROI over time. Its pricing aligns with the feature depth, thus justifying its cost for extensive enterprise-level deployments.