Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Qualys TotalCloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Qualys TotalCloud
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
23rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (24th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (17th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (19th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (6th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (15th)
 

Featured Reviews

FC
Sep 13, 2024
Integrated security for streamlined code scanning with scope for dynamic and API improvements
We have integrated Checkmarx into all the company's development pipelines. We use it to scan more than 4,000 repositories and around 25,000 pipelines.  The integration is particularly useful as it works directly with several common SCM solutions in the market, such as GitHub and Bitbucket, and with…
Brad Mathis - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 10, 2024
Offers easy-to-follow instructions, enhanced posture management, and improved visibility
TotalCloud offers written explanations to guide us through fixing security vulnerabilities and reducing cyber risks. For instance, if we click on a finding like "ensure public access level is set to private for block containers" a CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations benchmark, TotalCloud will not only tell us which specific container is failing but also provide remediation steps. These steps include a clear, step-by-step guide to fix the issue directly from the Azure console or command line, making it easy to address security risks. After deploying TotalCloud and configuring the connectors for Azure, we quickly gained visibility into our cloud security posture. While the initial setup gathers data, the overall process is swift and delivers immediate insights. TotalCloud offers a unified way to assess vulnerabilities and threats across both Asset-as-a-service and software-as-a-service applications. While an additional module, Software Detection Response, is required for the same level of detail in SaaS assessments, it integrates seamlessly with TotalCloud and gathers information through the Azure connector. Similarly, the SDR component is used for Microsoft 365 environments, consolidating all threat data into a single report. It has significantly enhanced our posture management insight and awareness. It provides a valuable third-party perspective, highlighting potential security issues we might have missed with Microsoft's built-in settings. This independent view offers a more objective assessment, similar to having a security expert unaffiliated with Microsoft or any specific platform. TotalCloud summarizes our cloud security risks in a single view, prioritizing the most important ones. It allows us to generate reports based on severity levels (critical, high, medium) and offers pre-built dashboards like the Azure one, which highlights the most critical control failures along with the number of affected resources. This way, we can focus on addressing the most urgent issues first. We can use TruRisk in TotalCloud to view a risk score for our virtual machines. This score indicates the overall security posture of the machine, along with details on identified vulnerabilities confirmed and potential. While the TruRisk score is a valuable integration, I haven't had the chance to fully explore its functionalities in our environment yet.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."
"It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results."
"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."
"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."
"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."
"While automatic inventory detection upon connection is a helpful feature, a truly valuable capability would be assessing an environment's security posture against Azure and CIS best practices."
"Its excellent graphical interface makes the scanning process simple."
 

Cons

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."
"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."
"Qualys TotalCloud needs to enhance its scanning capabilities in the IP domain, as it currently lacks the functionality to resolve IPs to their corresponding domain names."
"The cloud licensing unit system is unclear, especially since "units" aren't well-defined."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."
"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."
"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."
"It is the right price for quality delivery."
"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."
"​Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."
"TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be."
"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?
TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be.
What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?
The cloud licensing unit system is somewhat unclear, especially since "units" aren't well-defined. While I'm getting the hang of it, the calculator remains confusing. Overall, simplifying the licen...
What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?
Our security setup utilizes Qualys TotalCloud to assess our Azure environment's compliance with CIS and Azure best practices. We recently added the Qualys Software-as-a-Service Detection Response (...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Wiz and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.