Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] vs Cisco UCS Director comparison

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 87% of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Cisco UCS Director users who would recommend it.

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Read 9 Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] reviews

87% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

1,362 Views
1,335 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Cisco UCS Director

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,576 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco UCS Director

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (22nd)

Featured Reviews

Zoom Tong

Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive

Our company uses the solution's GUI interface to configure and monitor ports. We look at usage and determine if there are any issues. Cisco is a very qualified company and has been in business for many, many years. The solution is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports. You…

Read full review

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can define all components and create a blueprint for consumption across all services."

"You can scale it easily."

"The solution is agile and it has APIs for integration."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"The solution has a blueprint pattern where you can club multiple machines, define middleware components, define dependencies of components, and create an application pattern for a Java stack that can be consumed across all services using the same TOSCA patterns for CloudCenter, vRealize Automation, and ServiceNow."

"Cisco has a lot of published information and documentation that helps users understand the product and its offering very well."

"Upgrades are very simple as well because they've allowed us to get updates directly in the CloudCenter Suite manager. If you need to do an upgrade to your setup afterward, you just push a button and it rolls out the parts and retires the old ones. It's seamless and very simple compared to what we've done before."

"However, for the rest of the solution, the product is doing a great job for what we require."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] pros

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

Cons

"For many clients, the main problem with the solution is the price. Cisco is very expensive. If they could somehow make the pricing more competitive, that would be a big draw."

"The improvement I would like to see is not one thing particular to CloudCenter. I'd say it's more of a message that the system is still using a lot of the different products and if they would all just fit better together, they all could be faster together."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"The tool should improve its security on the XDR part."

"They should provide an entire cloud offering, from architecture to network security features."

"We're moving away from it due to the fact that they discontinued the product and introduced something new that does not fit our purpose."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"The solution needs to be more simple."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] cons

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"The solution could be improved is including a feature where I could do things programmatically versus having to create workarounds to get what I want to get done."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is extremely expensive and has additional fees for things like monitoring."

"The tool's pricing is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is balanced with the market."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 10% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 5% of the time

Spacelift vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

April 2026

Download Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

April 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Also Known As

CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter

No data available

Overview

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.

Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.

What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?

Stability: Provides a robust platform with minimal downtime.
Ease of Setup: Simplifies the initial setup process to get users started quickly.
Documentation: Extensive guides and resources available for user support.
Workflow Automation: Action Orchestrator enables cross-infrastructure automation.
Blueprint Pattern: Defines middleware and dependencies effectively.
API Integration: Offers agility and flexibility with API support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

High Trust Level: Recognized reliability, especially in Latin America.
Configuration Support: Capability to configure down to individual ports.
Integration: Seamless integration with ACI and ASX-T.
Agility: Enhanced flexibility and adaptability to changes.

Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.

Cisco

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Sample Customers

NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.