Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] vs Cisco UCS Director comparison

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 87% of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Cisco UCS Director users who would recommend it.

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Read 9 Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] reviews

87% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

1,101 Views
1,079 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Cisco UCS Director

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco UCS Director

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (22nd)

Featured Reviews

Zoom Tong

Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive

Our company uses the solution's GUI interface to configure and monitor ports. We look at usage and determine if there are any issues. Cisco is a very qualified company and has been in business for many, many years. The solution is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports. You…

Read full review

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can define all components and create a blueprint for consumption across all services."

"The initial setup is fairly straightforward if you have a basic setup."

"However, for the rest of the solution, the product is doing a great job for what we require."

"The solution is agile and it has APIs for integration."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"Cisco CloudCenter's scalability is good."

"Cisco has a lot of published information and documentation that helps users understand the product and its offering very well."

"Upgrades are very simple as well because they've allowed us to get updates directly in the CloudCenter Suite manager. If you need to do an upgrade to your setup afterward, you just push a button and it rolls out the parts and retires the old ones. It's seamless and very simple compared to what we've done before."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] pros

"Overall, I think that this is a very good product, although nothing is perfect."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"Better visibility and better control are the main benefits people receive from Cisco UCS Director; the automation and the orchestration part, these three to four points are the key factors to decide on Cisco UCS Director."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

Cons

"They should provide an entire cloud offering, from architecture to network security features."

"The product is very expensive."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"The solution needs to be more simple."

"The tool should improve its security on the XDR part."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"Improvements are needed in UI and multi-tenancy for this solution."

"They can add some of those features to make the platform more usable for different backgrounds and developer skills."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] cons

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"The scalability of this solution needs to be improved because as it is now, you cannot scale the storage alone. Rather, you have to scale the storage and the compute together."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is balanced with the market."

"The solution is extremely expensive and has additional fees for things like monitoring."

"The tool's pricing is expensive."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

CloudStack vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 10% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

March 2026

Download Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

March 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Also Known As

CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter

No data available

Overview

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.

Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.

What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?

Stability: Provides a robust platform with minimal downtime.
Ease of Setup: Simplifies the initial setup process to get users started quickly.
Documentation: Extensive guides and resources available for user support.
Workflow Automation: Action Orchestrator enables cross-infrastructure automation.
Blueprint Pattern: Defines middleware and dependencies effectively.
API Integration: Offers agility and flexibility with API support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

High Trust Level: Recognized reliability, especially in Latin America.
Configuration Support: Capability to configure down to individual ports.
Integration: Seamless integration with ACI and ASX-T.
Agility: Enhanced flexibility and adaptability to changes.

Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.

Cisco

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Sample Customers

NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.