Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Juniper is ranked #50 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco DNA Center

Read 41 Cisco DNA Center reviews

1,766 Views
1,023 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

205 Views
137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco DNA Center

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Cisco DNA Center and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network management solutions. Marvis appears to have the upper hand in offering AI-driven insights and troubleshooting, suggesting a more intuitive approach to problem-solving.

Features: Cisco DNA Center offers network automation, detailed policy management, and security protocols. It provides powerful automation capabilities for network configuration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-powered analytics, proactive troubleshooting, and enhanced network visibility. It provides intuitive performance monitoring and predictive insights.

Room for Improvement: Cisco DNA Center can face challenges with integration speeds and complexity in scaling for smaller enterprises. Its user interface could be more streamlined. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant may need improvement in expanding certain AI features and enhancing integration depth in complex networks. Its analytics sometimes require fine-tuning to match diverse infrastructure needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco DNA Center's deployment process often involves more complex configurations but provides extensive resources and support. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant allows easier deployment with cloud-based strategies and provides efficient customer service, suitable for seamless integration with fewer hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco DNA Center typically entails higher upfront costs due to its extensive capabilities. It offers strong long-term ROI for larger networks. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant has a lower initial cost with a flexible subscription model, allowing operational savings driven by AI throughout its use.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco DNA Center

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (1st), Network Automation (2nd)

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco DNA Center is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AvrahamSonenthal

Senior Network Engineer at Inside Global

Efficiently manages our wireless network and provides valuable monitoring features

The platform's biggest benefit has been in managing our wireless network. Having a single pane of glass to control all wireless controllers and access points and to monitor activity has been a significant advantage. We're a small federal agency with around 300 network devices, so automation is a minor focus. It's more relevant for larger networks. The main benefits we've seen are in inventory management and the potential for configuration automation. However, I recommend using the DNA Centre only for larger networks with over a thousand devices; otherwise, it may not be cost-effective. Before proceeding, ensure that your devices are compatible with DNA Center, as not all Cisco devices are supported. Also, investing in proper training is different from plug-and-play. I rate it an eight.

Read full review

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automation is another key highlight. With automation, you can automate everything through a single port."

"The product gives a consolidated view."

"I think that their LAN automation is a very good feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The monitoring features are very useful for network engineers."

"It enables monitoring of various components such as access points, switch cards, and other elements within the company's solutions."

"The most valuable features were the monitoring, maintenance, and configuration."

"It does a lot of things automatically, and that's the big thing with it. They're making the software so that you don't need to be as knowledgeable as me on the switching and routing side to get your work done. If you want, you can have DNA troubleshoot your problem for you and give you solutions or fix it itself, if it was something that's just a configuration issue."

More Cisco DNA Center pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

Cons

"Requires more focus on the digital side of things."

"Cisco could improve the security side of their solutions."

"The solution's technical support is an area with which my company's clients have a problem. Cisco doesn't provide good technical support unless a user has a big account that Cisco wants to retain."

"The solution's integration feature can be better."

"The solution needs to improve the dashboard."

"As a user, it would be good if I could plug in controllers, suites, and devices from other vendors to Cisco DNA Center."

"DNA Center has been on the market for a few years and they need to update it."

"An area that needs improvement is the integration with other vendors."

More Cisco DNA Center cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The partnership price is notably high, but it ultimately depends on the chosen business model."

"The product is very costly."

"Affordability is a problem because it's created for large enterprises only. So, some customers, even if their engineers want the solution, might have problems with budget limitations."

"We get a yearly license at the time we buy the product."

"The licensing cost for Cisco DNA Center is not more than that of other solutions."

"Cisco DNA Center is too expensive."

"Our licensing agreement is for three years."

"The solution is expensive."

More Cisco DNA Center pricing and cost advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco DNA Center?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it gives some kind of ease in operations, especially since our company is moving from CLI to GUI-based configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco DNA Center?

The cost is very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco DNA Center?

The system is working fine for me currently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Center vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 8% of the time

Juniper Mist Wired Assurance vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 8% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs Cisco DNA Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco DNA Center Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 28% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 25% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center

March 2025

Download Cisco DNA Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

February 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Also Known As

DNA Center

No data available

Overview

Cisco DNA Center offers a comprehensive platform for network automation and management, providing detailed analytics, enhanced security, and streamlined operations for both wired and wireless networks.

Cisco DNA Center integrates with Cisco infrastructure to deliver efficient network automation and management, helping organizations improve network visibility, security, and control. It supports AI-driven analytics and automated workflows to enhance operational efficiency and reduce errors. Challenges include compatibility with third-party systems, steep learning curve, and complex deployment. Its interface facilitates centralized control, vital for troubleshooting, policy management, and configuration management, with support for zero-touch provisioning and SD-Access.

What are the key features of Cisco DNA Center?

Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights into network health with AI-driven analytics.
Centralized Security: Integrates with ISE for comprehensive security management.
Automated Device Management: Simplifies device provisioning and configuration transfers.
Wi-Fi Analytics: Offers deep insights into wireless network performance.
Zero-Touch Provisioning: Streamlines new device deployments with minimal human intervention.
Scalable Segmentation: Efficiently segments network traffic ensuring security and performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces potential errors and streamlines workflow.
Enhanced Security: Integration with Cisco ISE bolsters security capabilities.
Network Visibility: Comprehensive dashboards and analysis tools enhance monitoring.
Troubleshooting: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying and resolving issues swiftly.

In sectors such as healthcare, finance, and retail, Cisco DNA Center is utilized for its ability to enhance security and compliance, manage large-scale networks, and provide detailed analytics for better operational decision-making. Its support for location tracking and policy automation ensures efficient network management across diverse environments.

Cisco

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Buyer's Guide

Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

March 2025

Free Report: Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco DNA Center vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.