Cisco IOS Security and Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall are prominent network security solutions. User reviews indicate higher satisfaction with Cisco IOS Security's pricing and support, while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall outperforms in features.
Features: Cisco IOS Security is noted for robust threat detection, integration capabilities, and solid network security support. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers advanced threat protection, flexible deployment options, and granular control over network policies. Users find Forcepoint's extensive feature set more compelling despite Cisco's strong integration abilities.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Cisco IOS Security could improve its complexity, steep learning curve, and initial setup process. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall needs better reporting tools, reduced performance lags, and enhanced real-time tracking capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS Security has a challenging deployment process but is supported by comprehensive documentation and strong customer service. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers straightforward deployment and efficient customer support, receiving higher user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS Security is recognized for cost-effectiveness and a solid return on investment. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, while more expensive, delivers high ROI through superior features and performance. Users find Forcepoint justifies its higher costs with enhanced functionality and security outcomes.
Clients are now comfortable and not wasting productive hours on IT support.
We have experienced a positive return on investment by utilizing Fortinet's products.
There's definitely an ROI. Having a centralized way of managing and applying policies across the entire organization always helps.
Cybersecurity ROI could be $1 or $100 million, depending on the risk of data behind it.
He explained that it required a command line configuration, as it couldn't be done through the graphical user interface.
I would rate their support for FortiGate a nine out of ten.
They offer very accurate solutions.
Unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging.
They scale up really well from smaller models like the FortiGate 40 and 50 to bigger sites with the FortiGate 100 for more throughput - up to enterprise datacenters.
There are many options available, and we can choose the size of the box based on our requirements.
You can choose a cheaper model if you only have 20-30 users, but you will need to spend more money for a FortiGate solution that covers 5,000.
There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze.
Improper handling of these can lead to a memory surge, a well-known bug that can cause the entire system to freeze.
It is less stable than Palo Alto Networks and Check Point firewalls because there are lots of bugs in the latest firmware.
I find Cisco IOS Security to be a very stable product.
If I have put 10 GBPS of throughput on a firewall and I enable all of these features available, such as IPS or UTM functionalities, the throughput comes down to 1 GBPS.
By providing an integrated solution, users would have access to all features and functionalities within a single window, eliminating the need to navigate through multiple windows.
Investing in a solution that can accommodate such growth would be more cost-effective than repeatedly purchasing new hardware.
Fast response and efficient handling of issues, similar to how Fortinet responds, would be great.
Secure SD-WAN is free of charge.
The most expensive part is the renewal of the license subscription.
FortiGate is priced lower than Palo Alto.
In terms of pricing, I would place Forcepoint in the middle when compared to other firewalls like Fortinet and Palo Alto.
It's easy to monitor the end-to-end network through the firewall.
The firewall, IPS, and VPN functions are the most valuable features.
FortiGate provides solid protection against viruses, malware, and other threats.
This solution, called Network Access Controller, handles authentication, authorization, and accounting for devices accessing the network.
With Forcepoint, this process is simplified compared to others like Fortinet.
Fortinet FortiGate offers comprehensive network security and firewall protection across multiple locations. It effectively manages data traffic and secures environments with features like VPN, intrusion prevention, and UTM controls.
Organizations rely on Fortinet FortiGate for its robust integration with advanced security policies, ensuring significant protection for enterprises, cloud environments, and educational sectors. It facilitates network segmentation, application-level security, and authentication management, securing communication within and between locations such as branches and data centers. Its efficient SD-WAN and UTM features enable streamlined data management and enhanced threat protection capabilities. Users appreciate its centralized management, facilitating seamless operations across diverse environments.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate?
What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiGate?
Fortinet FortiGate is crucial in sectors like education, offering robust networks for secure data flow between campuses and facilitating remote learning. In enterprise environments, it allows efficient management of application traffic and security across multiple branches, while in the cloud, it seamlessly integrates with diverse platforms to enhance security infrastructure.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is a versatile and comprehensive solution for perimeter security, offering features such as SD-WAN, IPS, VPN, and cloud or on-premises subscription keys. It is preferred by many clients over Cisco and is used for obligation redundancy, VPN access, and as the main point of security in infrastructure.
The product is praised for its simplicity, flexibility, complete feature set, scalability, and central management capabilities. Other valuable features include IPS, firewall, sandbox, application control, filtering, security management center, connectivity, and integration capabilities.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.