Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Cisco and F5 are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while F5 is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 1.0% mindshare in ID, compared to F5’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.
Cisco IOS Security
Read 48 Cisco IOS Security reviews
  • 279 Views
  • 211 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Threat Stack Cloud Security...
Read 8 Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reviews
  • 264 Views
  • 192 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 29, 2025

Cisco IOS Security and Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform compete in security management. Cisco IOS Security has an edge in pricing and support, while Threat Stack boasts more comprehensive features.

Features: Cisco IOS Security offers access control, VPN support, and intrusion prevention systems, focusing on robust network security. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform features workload security, compliance reporting, and excels in monitoring cloud environments, highlighting its cloud-centric approach.

Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS Security could improve its deployment complexity, expand cloud-specific offerings, and refine its user interface. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform needs enhancements in real-time threat detection, better integration with non-cloud systems, and reducing noise in alert systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS Security is seen as complex to deploy but benefits from strong customer service. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform is straightforward for cloud-native applications, supported by satisfactory customer service, appealing to cloud-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS Security typically comes with higher setup costs but offers good long-term ROI tied to its strong brand. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform requires a moderate initial investment, promising better ROI specifically for businesses focused on cloud security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,997 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Cisco IOS Security offers high ROI through improved efficiency, reduced risks, cost savings, and a beneficial subscription model.
Sentiment score
7.3
Threat Stack Cloud Security boosted compliance and revenue, reduced staffing needs, enhanced security, and expanded infrastructure dramatically.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco IOS Security offers expert support but faces criticism for slow responses and communication challenges, remaining a strong choice.
Sentiment score
7.4
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform's support is praised for responsiveness, precise solutions, and effective communication with technical representatives.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco IOS Security is praised for scalability and efficiency but may require additional hardware and specific Cisco equipment.
Sentiment score
8.2
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform is scalable, easy to deploy, and efficient across AWS accounts, with minor configuration concerns.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco IOS Security is praised for stability and reliability, with few integration issues reported when not using Cisco equipment.
Sentiment score
7.5
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is stable and efficient, with minor GUI and agent issues for some users.
I find Cisco IOS Security to be a very stable product.
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco IOS Security report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco IOS Security needs more intuitive management, better performance, advanced features, and improved integration, usability, and support.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform needs UI improvements, better API alignment, and enhanced integrations, especially for serverless and container environments.
 

Setup Cost

Cisco IOS Security is pricey, subscription-based, aimed at medium-to-large enterprises, with recent SMB options, often seen as expensive.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform offers value with transparent pricing, ranging $15-$20 monthly, seen as competitively priced by users.
 

Valuable Features

Cisco IOS Security enhances network security with robust features, user-friendly interface, and strong performance, preferred over competitors.
Threat Stack Cloud Security platform is esteemed for its configurability, integration, monitoring capabilities, and effective alert management.
This solution, called Network Access Controller, handles authentication, authorization, and accounting for devices accessing the network.
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco IOS Security report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco IOS Security
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (21st)
Threat Stack Cloud Security...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
24th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (38th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (29th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (34th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco IOS Security is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Karthik Venkataraman - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly and excels in documentation, making it easier to resolve issues
Cisco IOS Security is a mature product with extensive capabilities, serving as the base for the defense layer. It offers good network visibility, which helps in rapid response through the Rapid Threat Containment feature. Its deployment and configuration are straightforward. From a networking perspective, for instance, Cisco IOS incorporates time-tested security features. The zone-based firewall feature has significantly influenced our network security management. For instance, when managing multiple geolocations, it's essential to apply geographically appropriate policies. If a customer operates within the UK zone, I need to implement UK-specific policies. This approach is also applicable to customers in the Asia Pacific and UK regions. It enables me to tailor security policies based on the geographical location of my customers, such as adjusting policies for customers in China or Japan. This flexibility helps in creating a comprehensive zone list. Additionally, this feature allows for seamless service agreements between all zones from headquarters, providing access to all zones within the firewall we create. Essentially, it facilitates the creation of zones within the firewall.
Read full review
SC
SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for
They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
30%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco IOS Security?
Cisco IOS Security is a mature product with extensive capabilities, serving as the base for the defense layer. It offers good network visibility, which helps in rapid response through the Rapid Thr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS Security?
Pricing can be reduced. I rate the current price for the product a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco IOS Security?
While I do not have specific recommendations for improvement, pricing can be reduced.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 34% of the time
OPNsense vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
OPNsense vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 19% of the time
Netgate pfSense vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Netgate pfSense vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 13% of the time
Fortinet FortiOS vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Fortinet FortiOS vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 11% of the time
Meraki MX vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Meraki MX vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 9% of the time
More Cisco IOS Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 24% of the time
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 23% of the time
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 19% of the time
Darktrace vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Darktrace vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 17% of the time
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security
January 2025
Cisco IOS Security reportDownload Cisco IOS Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
January 2025
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reportDownload Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

IOS Security
Threat Stack, CSP,
 

Overview

Cisco IOS Software delivers a sophisticated set of security capabilities for a comprehensive, layered security approach throughout your network infrastructure. Cisco IOS security technologies help to defend critical business processes against attack and disruption, protect privacy, and support policy and regulatory compliance controls.
Cisco

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?
  • Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
  • Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
  • Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
  • Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
  • API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
  • SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.
What are the benefits and ROI features?
  • Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
  • Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
  • Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

F5
 

Sample Customers

Arup Group, Brunel University London, City of Biel, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, K&L Gates , New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Offshore Northern Seas, Transplace
StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
January 2025
Free Report: Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco IOS Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.