Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
683 followers
Post review

Top Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering real-time threat detection, compliance auditing, and an intuitive interface, empowering users to efficiently monitor and secure their cloud infrastructure against evolving threats.

F5 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with F5, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Threat Stack is attractive for its cost efficiency, simplicity, and responsive service, making it ideal for those seeking straightforward security. In comparison, Prisma Cloud suits organizations looking for robust, comprehensive security through extensive features and integrations, despite its higher cost and complexity.
Download Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] required minimal setup cost, making it accessible, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involved a more significant initial investment, highlighting its advanced features and comprehensive security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] required minimal setup cost, making it accessible, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks involved a more significant initial investment, highlighting its advanced features and comprehensive security capabilities.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Threat Stack excels with context-rich insights and real-time alerting for security monitoring. In comparison, AWS GuardDuty integrates advanced threat intelligence and machine learning. Threat Stack offers flexibility for multi-cloud environments, while AWS GuardDuty provides seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem, delivering detailed threat detection capabilities.
Download AWS GuardDuty vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] has a more complex setup process, potentially increasing initial costs, while AWS GuardDuty offers a streamlined and cost-efficient setup, making deployment quicker and easier.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] has a more complex setup process, potentially increasing initial costs, while AWS GuardDuty offers a streamlined and cost-efficient setup, making deployment quicker and easier.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is valued for competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced real-time threat detection and AI analytics. CrowdStrike's higher cost is offset by extensive threat coverage, while Threat Stack provides an affordable solution with straightforward deployment.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] has a higher setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Threat Stack offers cost-effective real-time detection, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lacework’s comprehensive automation and scalability cater to enterprises needing dynamic environments. Lacework’s seamless deployment and enhanced ROI justify its investment for organizations prioritizing advanced capabilities over initial pricing.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] involves minimal setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP appeals with its integrated setup resources providing comprehensive support, highlighting a distinction in initial investment and setup approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] involves minimal setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP appeals with its integrated setup resources providing comprehensive support, highlighting a distinction in initial investment and setup approach.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers cost-effectiveness and robust support in multi-cloud environments. In comparison, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides superior threat detection and compliance features in hybrid settings. Tech buyers may prefer CloudGuard for current support or Threat Stack for comprehensive features.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a straightforward setup with clearly defined costs, while Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] was known for its higher and more complex setup expenses. Both products present distinct cost structures, highlighting significant differences in init...
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a straightforward setup with clearly defined costs, while Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] was known for its higher and more complex setup expenses. Both products present distinct cost structures, highlighting significant differences in init...
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
Threat Stack excels with competitive pricing and simple deployment, appealing to businesses seeking effective real-time threat detection. In comparison, Tenable Cloud Security justifies a higher price through advanced analytics, offering more in-depth security coverage, ideal for organizations needing robust vulnerability management and comprehensive security features.
Download Tenable Cloud Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] had low setup costs, while Tenable Cloud Security was more expensive to set up, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment for businesses considering these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] had low setup costs, while Tenable Cloud Security was more expensive to set up, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment for businesses considering these solutions.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security
4.0 out of 5
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is praised for cost-effective pricing and responsive support, making it accessible. In comparison, BMC Helix Cloud Security offers advanced automation and cloud-native support, attracting tech buyers seeking comprehensive security despite higher initial costs.
Download BMC Helix Cloud Security vs. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Report
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] requires a moderate setup cost, while BMC Helix Cloud Security offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment expenses between the two cloud security platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] requires a moderate setup cost, while BMC Helix Cloud Security offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment expenses between the two cloud security platforms.

Related categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
Container Security
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)