Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and SonicWall SonicWave Access Points compete in the wireless networking domain. Cisco Meraki has a slight edge in support and user satisfaction, while SonicWall SonicWave offers advanced features for comprehensive capabilities.
Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has cloud-based management, seamless integration, and a streamlined networking experience. SonicWall SonicWave Access Points provide advanced security settings, high-performance capabilities, and suitability for demanding environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers straightforward deployment with an intuitive cloud-based management system. SonicWall SonicWave Access Points require more setup time but allow comprehensive configuration. Cisco’s customer service is responsive, whereas SonicWall provides deep technical support for complex needs.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has higher setup costs but offers ROI through user-friendly management and strong support. SonicWall SonicWave Access Points have appealing upfront pricing with ROI demonstrated through enhanced performance and a feature-rich environment.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
SonicWall SonicWave series wireless access points (APs) combine high-performance IEEE 802.11ac Wave 2 wireless technology with flexible deployment options. These APs can be managed via the cloud using SonicWall WiFi Cloud Manager (WCM) or through SonicWall's industry-leading next-generation firewalls.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.