

Cisco Meraki and Ubiquiti WLAN compete in the wireless LAN category. Cisco Meraki has the upper hand in terms of cloud management and customer service, while Ubiquiti leads in cost-effectiveness and certain performance features.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers cloud-based management, enabling seamless network adjustments without onsite presence. Its user-friendly dashboard delivers comprehensive analytics and device management, perfect for non-engineers. In contrast, Ubiquiti WLAN provides robust performance with seamless roaming and an effective management interface. It also includes a heat map feature for efficient troubleshooting and operates on a cost-effective one-time purchase model.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki users mention licensing costs, limited advanced features for enterprises, and the need for better GDPR compliance. Ubiquiti WLAN could improve through enhanced integration options, advanced enterprise functionalities, and more detailed troubleshooting logs. Cisco Meraki has more notable limitations in higher-tier features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki offers flexible deployment options including on-premises and public cloud, making it highly adaptable. Ubiquiti WLAN supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments. Cisco Meraki is known for prompt customer support, whereas Ubiquiti, while reliable, lacks the extensive online resources available with Cisco Meraki.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is viewed as costly with subscription-based licensing and significant renewal fees. However, its ROI is deemed justified by its advanced features. Ubiquiti offers a more budget-friendly solution with no recurring licenses and a one-time purchase model, positioning it as an attractive option for cost-sensitive consumers while delivering satisfactory ROI.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
The problem with Ubiquiti is the lack of a serious reselling chain, as they sell directly to the customer.
I seldom contact the technical support team as there is comprehensive documentation and FAQs available that help me resolve most issues independently.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
It might struggle in very complex environments with many users.
I would assess the scalability feature of Ubiquiti WLAN in accommodating my organization's growth or changing network demands as pretty scalable, warranting a nine out of ten rating.
Scalability is a strong point for Ubiquiti Wireless LAN.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
Proper connections and cabling are essential for maintaining stability.
It performs well as an access point but is not designed for high-density environments.
It does require some maintenance from my side, including troubleshooting and fixing occasionally.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
This could provide a detailed view of connections and possible disconnections, offering valuable insights for improving Wi-Fi connections.
Capacity has been a concern, especially since I needed to change some of my devices to a 10 gig network due to limitations.
There is room for improvement in providing the flexibility to change the default management VLAN from VLAN one to another for enhanced security.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
it is considered medium-priced, suitable for the quality it offers.
Ubiquiti is affordable, as it does not require recurring licensing fees.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance.
All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard.
The Cloud Key Controller is a valuable feature because it allows me to access the wireless system from the cloud and locally within the same network, enhancing network management.
I utilize Ubiquiti WLAN unified management system, and it helps streamline network management by making consistent configuration of all my access points and switches.
The web interface in the controller allows for quick configuration of devices with just one click, which is a significant advantage.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 9.6% |
| Ubiquiti WLAN | 4.9% |
| Other | 85.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.
What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.
Ubiquiti WLAN is recognized for its ease of use, robust performance, and competitive pricing, making it ideal for diverse network connectivity needs.
Ubiquiti WLAN offers wireless connectivity with features such as comprehensive heat maps and free controller software, emphasizing effective traffic management and strong security. Its unified management supports interoperability with other systems. Known for a reliable range and seamless updates, it is valued in corporate settings, hotels, and residential areas. There's potential for growth in areas like firmware management, cloud integration, and support, while pricing and platform integration might improve its appeal in large enterprises.
What are the key features of Ubiquiti WLAN?Used widely in IT, hospitality, and residential environments, Ubiquiti WLAN is suitable for internet access, site management, and point-to-point configurations. Applications span video conferencing, IoT, and CCTV in sectors like mining and nursing homes, with IT providers deploying it for guest WiFi and client solutions.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.