Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti WLAN compete in the wireless networking solutions category. Users typically prefer Cisco Meraki for its advanced features and support, though Ubiquiti WLAN is notable for affordability and robust features.
Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers seamless connectivity, comprehensive security, and extensive network management capabilities. Ubiquiti WLAN is recognized for its scalability, stability, and strong performance in various environments.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN users point to its high cost and occasional management complexity. Ubiquiti WLAN has limited technical support options and occasional firmware inconsistencies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer support. Ubiquiti WLAN also offers an easy deployment but lacks in customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is seen as an expensive solution with a high ROI through robust performance and features. Ubiquiti WLAN is valued for its cost-efficiency with a lower initial setup cost and solid ROI.
It's built for larger environments.
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
It's a cloud solution with Mist, which helps troubleshoot and provides visibility to look at different access points.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
UniFi is a revolutionary Wi-Fi system that combines Enterprise performance, unlimited scalability, a central management controller and disruptive pricing.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.