Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Firewall
Ranking in Cisco Security Portfolio
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
405
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (4th)
Cisco Vulnerability Managem...
Ranking in Cisco Security Portfolio
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Cisco Security Portfolio category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Firewall is 7.3%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is 1.7%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cisco Security Portfolio
 

Featured Reviews

WaleedAboda - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 1, 2024
Provides IPS intrusion prevention, anti-malware, and anti-spam
Cisco Secure Firewall has impacted our cybersecurity cost efficiency The important features are IPS intrusion prevention, anti-malware, and anti-spam. Cisco firewall needs experience with hardware. They should also enhance security antivirus, application detection, user detection, and ID…
AshishPaliwal - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2022
Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability
An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like this work if my company has already invested thousands or maybe millions in a GRC solution? Do I still need it and how does it fit into an existing SAP environment? There could be interoperability, having more data sources, integrating Splunk, Qualys, FireEye, Rapid7, Carbon Black. I'm sure all that can be done to an extent, with a little more insight and a little more accuracy on the industry numbers and trends. I'd like the solution to offer any sort of assistance in any way with the remediation part, not just identification of vulnerability risk, and that is second.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The user interface is easy to navigate."
"The most valuable Cisco Secure Firewall features are options, features, and ease of deployment because it's an appliance."
"The most valuable features are the provision of internet access, AnyConnect, and VPN capabilities."
"VPN, firewall, and IDS/IPS allow us to deliver services to meet client needs across various industry verticals."
"I think that the firewall feature is the most valuable to me as it is one of the oldest features for this solution. We also appreciate how stable the VPN is."
"It's the VPN side of things that has been most useful for us. It allows us to secure our users even when they're working from home. They are able to access all of our resources, no matter where they are in the world."
"A good intrusion prevention system and filtering."
"The AnyConnect remote access VPN gives us an easy way to deploy remote working for our users."
"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."
 

Cons

"My team tells me that other solutions such as Fortinet and Palo Alto are easier to implement."
"The stability is not the best."
"I see room for improvement when it comes to integrating all the devices into a central management system. Cisco doesn't provide this, but there are some good products in the market that can provide it."
"Cisco Secure Firewall's integration with cloud providers has room for improvement. We could do more in terms of integration, for example, if we had a tag on an instance."
"We only have an issue with time sync with Cisco ASA and NTP. If the time is out of sync, it will be a disaster for the failover."
"We don't have any serious problems. The firewall models that we have are quite legacy, and they have slower performance. We are currently investigating the possibility of migrating to next-generation firewalls."
"I would like to see an IE version of the solution where it is ruggedized."
"We use the FTD management platform for the boxes. The GUI that manages multiple Firepower boxes could be improved so that the user experience is better."
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was pretty comparable to other solutions when we purchased it."
"I bought a license for three years and it was really affordable."
"The licensing has definitely improved and got a lot easier. It is customizable depending on what the customer needs, which is a good benefit, instead of just a broad license that everybody has to pay."
"The cost of keeping the licensing up on the ASA is very expensive. It has a lot of positives, but the cost of going with it is really starting to be a major negative right now."
"We are in the process of renewing our three-year license, which costs approximately $24,000 USD for the thirty-six months."
"Based on the services that you will get, especially the AMP license, the price is very reasonable."
"With the bundling mode with Duo licensing, it's now better. It's better to have one simplified global licensing mode, and this is what Cisco has done with bundling. The next-generation firewalls include a set of features such as filtering, emails, and IPS. This combination offers the best way for customers to manage their operating expenses."
"Cisco's pricing is high, at times, for what they provide."
"I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cisco Security Portfolio solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user206346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2015
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
7%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?
When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage at large. In my opinion, Fortinet would be the best option and l use Fortinet too...
Which is better - Fortinet FortiGate or Cisco ASA Firewall?
One of our favorite things about Fortinet Fortigate is that you can deploy on the cloud or on premises. Fortinet Fortigate is very stable, reliable, and consistent. We like that we can manage the e...
How does Cisco's ASA firewall compare with the Firepower NGFW?
It is easy to integrate Cisco ASA with other Cisco products and also other NAC solutions. When you understand the Cisco ecosystem, it is very simple to handle. This solution has traffic inspection ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cisco ASA Firewall, Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAv, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall
Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.
TransUnion
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco and others in Cisco Security Portfolio. Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.