Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

Cisco and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Cisco is ranked #23, while Rapid7 is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7. Cisco holds a 2.2% mindshare in RBVM, compared to Rapid7’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Read 1 Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) review

1,347 Views
835 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightVM

Read 66 Rapid7 InsightVM reviews

8,491 Views
4,161 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Rapid7 InsightVM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Horizon3.ai, Tenable and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Vulnerability Managem...

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Portfolio (11th)

Rapid7 InsightVM

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is 2.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightVM is 7.8%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rapid7 InsightVM	7.8%
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)	2.2%
Other	90.0%

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

AshishPaliwal

Self-employed at Self-employed

Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability

An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like this work if my company has already invested thousands or maybe millions in a GRC solution? Do I still need it and how does it fit into an existing SAP environment? There could be interoperability, having more data sources, integrating Splunk, Qualys, FireEye, Rapid7, Carbon Black. I'm sure all that can be done to an extent, with a little more insight and a little more accuracy on the industry numbers and trends. I'd like the solution to offer any sort of assistance in any way with the remediation part, not just identification of vulnerability risk, and that is second.

Read full review

reviewer2775840

Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Manages vulnerabilities effectively over time but needs improvement in web coverage and dashboard flexibility

Most of the dynamic asset tagging we use is manual, not dynamic. To manage the assets, we employed the manual approach because we have a limitation regarding the license, so we don't use the dynamic approach much. I don't know how the configuration assessment has assisted with meeting compliance standards. The product that we use is the on-premise solution where we configure assets and dynamically scan them. However, we use the default policies more, the template, so Rapid7 InsightVM on-premise version is not that effective in the web-related systems. However, it is best on the OS to identify and discover the OS-related vulnerabilities, more of open ports and the discovery of vulnerable ports or services. It would be better to improve Rapid7 InsightVM by including or working better to add web-related templates because it's not that effective in regard to web. I don't know if they may have a separate product regarding the web, but for the on-premise type, they are not strong in this area. I would prefer to see web-related templates in addition to improving the dashboard-related things because the dashboard has been constant for a very long time. It would be better to see various kinds of, perhaps a flexible type of dashboard. If it's not customizable at all, I would want to see the risk and asset over time with more flexibility. The current dashboard is not flexible in this regard; I have to dig down every day, so they should work on this as well, in addition to the web.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature; that is what it is used for and then data from different sources can be fed into it, and they have good dashboards, risk meters, and virtualization."

"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."

"Using Rapid7, we can install a scan engine, we can do our VPN connections, and we can conduct internal scans of remote sites. We prefer the web application. It's smarter and more accurate from an application perspective."

"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."

"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."

"We really didn't have any visibility at all and now we do, it's like night and day."

"Rapid7 InsightVM is an on-premise type product that has helped us manage potential vulnerabilities effectively."

"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities is a good feature along with the investigation, the trials function, and it's also user friendly."

"InsightVM provides a reliable and efficient solution with a very organized GUI, excellent ease of use, and reliable vulnerability scanning."

More Rapid7 InsightVM pros

Cons

"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

"Customer service needs significant improvement. There are delays in support response times, and support is not available promptly, especially when issues are escalated to another region."

"We found that after you passed an endpoint, it didn't always reflect it in the next scan. I'm not sure if it was a glitch or some issue with the product's software. That was never clear. That was always an issue and something that definitely needed improvement."

"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."

"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."

"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."

"The product's documentation could be enhanced with clearer and more detailed instructions."

"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."

"In terms of improvements, its price could be better. Our main issue with Rapid7 is that it is too expensive."

More Rapid7 InsightVM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

"It is pretty expensive. It depends on what you consider pricey, however, if you only look at vulnerability management solutions, such as within VM or VMDR, there are, I suppose the prices are almost the same. But I believe you will discover that for yourself."

"We purchase annual licenses."

"The solution is a bit more reasonably priced than other products."

"We have an annual license to use Rapid7 InsightVM and if we want to extend it, we will possibly choose more than one year."

"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."

"The license is annual and this is the optimal approach when it comes to most software."

"The price of the solution is less than the competitors."

"Comparing the price with the value that we receive, I am not happy with it."

More Rapid7 InsightVM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?

You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightVM?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that both the setup cost and licensing are great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightVM?

To improve Rapid7 InsightVM, I wish to have integration with patching systems, which would be useful to us. The usability of Rapid7 InsightVM is excellent, and the reporting module is one of the mo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vulcan Cyber vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 13% of the time

Brinqa vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 10% of the time

RiskIQ Illuminate vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 InsightVM

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 InsightVM

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Rapid7 InsightVM

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Rapid7 InsightVM

Compared 4% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Rapid7 InsightVM

Compared 4% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightVM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

June 2026

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) report

Download Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightVM

July 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightVM product report

Also Known As

Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform

InsightVM, NeXpose

Overview

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) provides a comprehensive approach to identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating vulnerabilities in IT environments, helping organizations to manage risk effectively.

Designed with advanced analytics, Cisco Vulnerability Management supports risk-based vulnerability management, enabling IT teams to focus on the most critical threats. This platform integrates seamlessly with existing security tools, offering a centralized solution for prioritizing vulnerabilities based on risk level. By aligning security efforts with business objectives, it ensures that resources are directed towards the most impactful areas of risk reduction.

What are the key features of Cisco Vulnerability Management?

Risk Scoring: Assesses vulnerability severity with contextual risk metrics, aiding prioritization.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with existing security architecture for streamlined workflow.
Data-Driven Insights: Offers actionable intelligence on security posture improvements.
Dynamic Dashboards: Provides real-time visibility into threat landscape and mitigation efforts.

What benefits can users expect from Cisco Vulnerability Management?

Improved Risk Prioritization: Focuses on high-impact vulnerabilities, optimizing remediation efforts.
Efficient Resource Allocation: Directs IT resources to the most pressing security threats.
Increased Security Posture: Enhances organization-wide security through informed decision-making.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cisco Vulnerability Management is crucial for maintaining stringent compliance standards. Its ability to integrate within complex IT ecosystems allows for flexible adaptation across sectors, ensuring that industry-specific vulnerabilities are effectively managed and mitigated.

Cisco

Rapid7 InsightVM provides advanced vulnerability scanning and remediation tracking with real-time data integration. Its intuitive interface supports both agent and agentless modes, enhancing cybersecurity by reducing exploitable vulnerabilities.

Rapid7 InsightVM integrates smoothly with existing security infrastructure, supporting detailed dashboards and reporting features for efficient risk scoring and vulnerability management. Users value its comprehensive asset tagging and the ability to prioritize vulnerabilities, appreciating host discovery capabilities. While InsightVM requires enhancements in reporting flexibility and patch management integration, and users seek improved support response times and extended security measures. Desired improvements also include greater integration with other tools and expanded dashboard customization.

What are the key features of Rapid7 InsightVM?

Vulnerability Scanning: Delivers detailed assessments of network vulnerabilities.
Risk Scoring: Provides efficient risk prioritization guided by detailed analytics.
Dashboards: Offers customizable, comprehensive metrics for insightful reporting.
Asset Tagging: Supports efficient asset management with intuitive tagging capabilities.
Host Discovery: Features robust host discovery for enhanced security coverage.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Real-Time Data: Enables timely and accurate vulnerability management.
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easier user interaction and quick access to vital functions.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly works with existing systems for enhanced security.
False Positives Reduction: Improves accuracy, minimizing reporting errors.
Comprehensive Insight: Provides valuable insights that aid in prioritization and remediation.

InsightVM's implementation spans several industries, offering robust solutions in vulnerability management, patch management, and cybersecurity compliance facilitation. Organizations leverage its capacity for comprehensive network monitoring and critical vulnerability visibility to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

TransUnion

ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Horizon3.ai, Tenable and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.